Multiplex PCR for Microbiological Testing in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis- and Liver Cirrhosis-Related Peritonitis: Faster, but Less Sensitive

<b>Background:</b> We analyzed the performance of a multiplex PCR application (Unyvero IAI) in comparison to culture in a cohort of peritonitis patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis or with liver cirrhosis. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a single-center study of 47 patients with clinically suspected peritonitis and compared pathogen detection rates of culture and PCR. The main outcome of interest was a comparison of accuracy and time to final positive result. <b>Results:</b> In the total cohort, the pathogen detection rate in culture was 58.14% versus 34.88% in PCR (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Detection rates of bacteria in peritoneal dialysis patients were even higher by culture (70.83%) but comparably low by PCR (37.50%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). The majority of discordant results were in the Gram-positive spectrum (81.82%). Differential time to final positive result was 37.39 ± 16.75 h. <b>Conclusion:</b> Time gains by using PCR diagnostic have to be weighed against lower detection rates, mainly in Gram-positive infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082641
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiplex PCR for Microbiological Testing in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis- and Liver Cirrhosis-Related Peritonitis: Faster, but Less Sensitive

Daniel Pörner, Sebastian Schwab, Jacob Nattermann, Philipp Ludwig Lutz et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.40
article

Multiplex PCR for Microbiological Testing in Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis- and Liver Cirrhosis-Related Peritonitis: Faster, but Less Sensitive

Daniel Pörner, Sebastian Schwab, Jacob Nattermann, Philipp Ludwig Lutz, Achim Hoerauf, Christian Peer Strassburg, Dominik Boes, Gunnar T. R. Hischebeth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> We analyzed the performance of a multiplex PCR application (Unyvero IAI) in comparison to culture in a cohort of peritonitis patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis or with liver cirrhosis. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a single-center study of 47 patients with clinically suspected peritonitis and compared pathogen detection rates of culture and PCR. The main outcome of interest was a comparison of accuracy and time to final positive result. <b>Results:</b> In the total cohort, the pathogen detection rate in culture was 58.14% versus 34.88% in PCR (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Detection rates of bacteria in peritoneal dialysis patients were even higher by culture (70.83%) but comparably low by PCR (37.50%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). The majority of discordant results were in the Gram-positive spectrum (81.82%). Differential time to final positive result was 37.39 ± 16.75 h. <b>Conclusion:</b> Time gains by using PCR diagnostic have to be weighed against lower detection rates, mainly in Gram-positive infections.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
University of Bonn (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.