The Aesthetics of Interest and the Irish Question: William Carleton's and Anthony Trollope's Famine Novels

Focusing on famine novels by William Carleton and Anthony Trollope and drawing upon Sianne Ngai's account of aesthetic categories, this article questions how the “interesting,” as an aesthetic category, accommodates cultural difference and distance, on one hand, and demonstrates how material interests shape and delimit the expansion of the public sphere, on the other. It argues that Irish novels present Ireland as aesthetically interesting insofar as it differs from England—suggesting strangeness, peculiarity, unpredictability. Yet including Ireland in a vision of a shared public tends to require the opposite—the assimilation of Irish people into British interests—rendering Ireland conventional and familiar. In other words, the strangeness or novelty that makes Ireland aesthetically interesting is the very thing that prevents Irish people from being incorporated into the liberal idea of a public or a vision of British public interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Victorian Literature and Culture
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1060150324000020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Irish and British Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Aesthetics of Interest and the Irish Question: William Carleton's and Anthony Trollope's Famine Novels

Mary L. Mullen
1 citations
Victorian Literature and Culture
Irish and British Studies
4.20
article

The Aesthetics of Interest and the Irish Question: William Carleton's and Anthony Trollope's Famine Novels

Mary L. Mullen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Focusing on famine novels by William Carleton and Anthony Trollope and drawing upon Sianne Ngai's account of aesthetic categories, this article questions how the “interesting,” as an aesthetic category, accommodates cultural difference and distance, on one hand, and demonstrates how material interests shape and delimit the expansion of the public sphere, on the other. It argues that Irish novels present Ireland as aesthetically interesting insofar as it differs from England—suggesting strangeness, peculiarity, unpredictability. Yet including Ireland in a vision of a shared public tends to require the opposite—the assimilation of Irish people into British interests—rendering Ireland conventional and familiar. In other words, the strangeness or novelty that makes Ireland aesthetically interesting is the very thing that prevents Irish people from being incorporated into the liberal idea of a public or a vision of British public interest.

Victorian Literature and CultureVol. 53(1)
Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Irish and British Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Aesthetics of Interest and the Irish Question: William Carleton's and Anthony Trollope's Famine Novels — Mary L. Mullen · Victorian Literature and Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS