The contradictions of legitimation strategies and the welfaring of education

This paper explores the interplay between legitimation crises and welfare state contradictions, as well as the extent to which these can be witnessed in the UK education field. The paper argues that these ideas, developed in the 1970s in a changing global context that was placing severe pressure on welfare states, still have resonance in the twenty-first century. While welfare state regimes may have undergone some restructuring in the twenty-first century, they are still tasked with the job of responding to crises and upheavals in the economic sector. The manner in which they respond, however, has changed, which has moved education into a more central role as a tool of legitimation. The shift from a mediated to a delegated welfare state apparatus has resulted in ever greater welfaring of education policy, to such an extent that contradictions can be identified in modern efforts to stave off crises of legitimation at the political level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Education
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2025.2480571
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The contradictions of legitimation strategies and the welfaring of education

Mark Murphy
Cambridge Journal of Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

The contradictions of legitimation strategies and the welfaring of education

Mark Murphy
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the interplay between legitimation crises and welfare state contradictions, as well as the extent to which these can be witnessed in the UK education field. The paper argues that these ideas, developed in the 1970s in a changing global context that was placing severe pressure on welfare states, still have resonance in the twenty-first century. While welfare state regimes may have undergone some restructuring in the twenty-first century, they are still tasked with the job of responding to crises and upheavals in the economic sector. The manner in which they respond, however, has changed, which has moved education into a more central role as a tool of legitimation. The shift from a mediated to a delegated welfare state apparatus has resulted in ever greater welfaring of education policy, to such an extent that contradictions can be identified in modern efforts to stave off crises of legitimation at the political level.

Cambridge Journal of EducationVol. 55(2)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The contradictions of legitimation strategies and the welfaring of education — Mark Murphy · Cambridge Journal of Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS