Predicting survival in prospective clinical trials using weakly-supervised QSP

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models of cancer immunity provide mechanistic insights into cellular dynamics and drug effects that are difficult to study clinically. However, their inability to predict patient survival mechanistically limits their utility in anti-cancer drug development. To overcome this, we link virtual patients from a QSP model to real clinical trial patients. Using data from atezolizumab trials in non-small cell lung cancer, we show that tumor-based linkage effectively captures survival outcomes. By treating linked survival and censoring as weak supervision labels, we trained survival models using only QSP model covariates, without clinical covariates. Our approach also predicts survival for treatments not included in training data. Specifically, we accurately estimated survival hazard ratios (HR) for chemotherapy monotherapy and atezolizumab plus chemotherapy combination. The predicted HR of 0.70 (95% prediction interval [PI] 0.55-0.86) closely matches the observed HR of 0.79 (95% PI 0.64-0.98) from the IMpower130 trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Precision Oncology
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-00898-6
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting survival in prospective clinical trials using weakly-supervised QSP

Matthew West, Vincent Lemaire, Jiajie Yu, Kenta Yoshida
npj Precision Oncology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Predicting survival in prospective clinical trials using weakly-supervised QSP

Matthew West, Vincent Lemaire, Jiajie Yu, Kenta Yoshida
article en

Abstract

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models of cancer immunity provide mechanistic insights into cellular dynamics and drug effects that are difficult to study clinically. However, their inability to predict patient survival mechanistically limits their utility in anti-cancer drug development. To overcome this, we link virtual patients from a QSP model to real clinical trial patients. Using data from atezolizumab trials in non-small cell lung cancer, we show that tumor-based linkage effectively captures survival outcomes. By treating linked survival and censoring as weak supervision labels, we trained survival models using only QSP model covariates, without clinical covariates. Our approach also predicts survival for treatments not included in training data. Specifically, we accurately estimated survival hazard ratios (HR) for chemotherapy monotherapy and atezolizumab plus chemotherapy combination. The predicted HR of 0.70 (95% prediction interval [PI] 0.55-0.86) closely matches the observed HR of 0.79 (95% PI 0.64-0.98) from the IMpower130 trial.

npj Precision OncologyVol. 9(1)
Harvard University (US), Gene Therapy Laboratory (FR), System Simulation (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predicting survival in prospective clinical trials using weakly-supervised QSP — Matthew West, Vincent Lemaire, et al. · npj Precision Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS