Farmer as an entrepreneur – commentary to Judgment of the Supreme Court of 17 February 2021, I NSNc 152/20

The issue covered in the judgment subject to the gloss concerns the determination whether the manufacturing activity conducted by a farmer can be ascribed the status of an economic activity. In the light of the legal considerations presented, the position of the Supreme Court assuming that under the public law provisions, a farmer conducts economic activity is shared. In turn, under civil law provisions, the farmer should be treated as an entrepreneur. However, the thesis expressed by the Supreme Court regarding the qualification of an agricultural holding as one run exclusively for self-supply, subordinated to the satisfaction of one’s own needs, was not shared. The position adopted stems from the need to create a line of jurisprudence and legal norms favourable to running an agricultural holding on the widest possible scale, not limited solely to satisfying one’s individual needs for food, and optimising the production of foodstuffs, which is undoubtedly supported by the public interest.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/glosa.2025.1.108-113
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farmer as an entrepreneur – commentary to Judgment of the Supreme Court of 17 February 2021, I NSNc 152/20

Agnieszka Malarewicz‐Jakubów, Michał Gornowicz
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Farmer as an entrepreneur – commentary to Judgment of the Supreme Court of 17 February 2021, I NSNc 152/20

Agnieszka Malarewicz‐Jakubów, Michał Gornowicz
article en

Abstract

The issue covered in the judgment subject to the gloss concerns the determination whether the manufacturing activity conducted by a farmer can be ascribed the status of an economic activity. In the light of the legal considerations presented, the position of the Supreme Court assuming that under the public law provisions, a farmer conducts economic activity is shared. In turn, under civil law provisions, the farmer should be treated as an entrepreneur. However, the thesis expressed by the Supreme Court regarding the qualification of an agricultural holding as one run exclusively for self-supply, subordinated to the satisfaction of one’s own needs, was not shared. The position adopted stems from the need to create a line of jurisprudence and legal norms favourable to running an agricultural holding on the widest possible scale, not limited solely to satisfying one’s individual needs for food, and optimising the production of foodstuffs, which is undoubtedly supported by the public interest.

Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i KomentarzachVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.