Non-disclosure agreement on remuneration and freedom of speech – a partially critical commentary on the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 20 June 2024, Application No. 4110/20, Boronyák v. Hungary

The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) under review is noteworthy for its clear emphasis on the primacy of a contractual obligation to respect the confidentiality of trade secrets regarding remuneration, overriding the freedom of expression and even the right to access public information. The most interesting aspect of the judgment lies in the ECtHR’s search for justification to allow the exclusion of freedom of expression in a civil contract concerning the disclosure of salary information, drawing an analogy to the obligations of an employee under an employment relationship. The ECtHR’s reasoning that voluntary submission to the terms of a civil contract is similar to an employee’s subordination, who is, by default, prohibited from disclosing their salary, is flawed. Although the final conclusion of the ECtHR is correct (the contractual obligation to protect trade secrets in relation to salary does not violate Article 10 (2) of the Convention), the reasoning behind it raises concerns. It is necessary to consider the legal system of the Council of Europe, which allows employees to disclose their remuneration, despite the formal limitation of the ECtHR’s jurisdiction to the Convention. Salary transparency serves as a tool supporting the principle of equal pay established in the European Social Charter. Therefore, the permissibility of contractual restrictions on freedom of expression lies not in the similarity to the employment relationship but in the need to protect property (trade secrets) and the possibility of self-restraint by the parties to the agreement. In this respect, the ECtHR’s emphasis on the lack of primacy of the public right to information over a contractual non-disclosure agreement is commendable, provided that access to public information can be obtained by other entities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/glosa.2025.1.65-75
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-disclosure agreement on remuneration and freedom of speech – a partially critical commentary on the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 20 June 2024, Application No. 4110/20, Boronyák v. Hungary

Małgorzata Kurzynoga, Krzysztof Kurosz
Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i Komentarzach
European and International Law Studies
article

Non-disclosure agreement on remuneration and freedom of speech – a partially critical commentary on the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 20 June 2024, Application No. 4110/20, Boronyák v. Hungary

Małgorzata Kurzynoga, Krzysztof Kurosz
article en

Abstract

The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) under review is noteworthy for its clear emphasis on the primacy of a contractual obligation to respect the confidentiality of trade secrets regarding remuneration, overriding the freedom of expression and even the right to access public information. The most interesting aspect of the judgment lies in the ECtHR’s search for justification to allow the exclusion of freedom of expression in a civil contract concerning the disclosure of salary information, drawing an analogy to the obligations of an employee under an employment relationship. The ECtHR’s reasoning that voluntary submission to the terms of a civil contract is similar to an employee’s subordination, who is, by default, prohibited from disclosing their salary, is flawed. Although the final conclusion of the ECtHR is correct (the contractual obligation to protect trade secrets in relation to salary does not violate Article 10 (2) of the Convention), the reasoning behind it raises concerns. It is necessary to consider the legal system of the Council of Europe, which allows employees to disclose their remuneration, despite the formal limitation of the ECtHR’s jurisdiction to the Convention. Salary transparency serves as a tool supporting the principle of equal pay established in the European Social Charter. Therefore, the permissibility of contractual restrictions on freedom of expression lies not in the similarity to the employment relationship but in the need to protect property (trade secrets) and the possibility of self-restraint by the parties to the agreement. In this respect, the ECtHR’s emphasis on the lack of primacy of the public right to information over a contractual non-disclosure agreement is commendable, provided that access to public information can be obtained by other entities.

Glosa Prawo Gospodarcze w Orzeczeniach i KomentarzachVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.