Intermediate Decisions on the Application of Coercive Measures at the Conclusion of a Pre-Trial Cooperation Agreement

Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of the features of interim court decisions on the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion in the framework of a special procedure for judicial proceedings at the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement. Purpose. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of these decisions, the presence or absence of competition grounds for the use of measures of criminal procedural coercion and the grounds (conditions) for considering the case in a special judicial procedure when concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement. Methodology. The conclusions and recommendations contained in the work are formulated through the integrated application of comparative legal, formal legal, systemic structural and specific sociological methods. Results. The paper identifies the features of interim decisions on the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion, due to the conclusion of an agreement and a simplified procedure for judicial proceedings. Proposals are formulated to improve the criminal procedure law in the field under study. Conclusion. The goal set in the work has been achieved, the problems of making interim decisions on the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion in a special procedure of judicial proceedings at the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement have been considered. The results obtained can be used to further study the features of interim decision-making in simplified court proceedings.