<i>Culpa in Contrahendo</i> and Due Diligence in M&amp;A Transactions

Abstract In the context of mergers &amp; acquisitions (M&amp;A) the seller and the buyer are engaging in a process called due diligence, during which information regarding the acquired company is disclosed. Usually this takes place through the creation of a data room by the seller and the uploading of documents there. A critical question here is how this process interacts with the seller’s duty of disclosure, namely the duty to disclose to the buyer material facts and issues related to the subject matter of the negotiated contract. Recently, this matter was addressed by the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH). In its judgment the BGH takes the view that the extent to which the seller is performing his duty of disclosure through due diligence must be assessed by taking account of the individual facts of each case. This paper is analyzing the BGH’s judgment and provides a critical approach on certain positions adopted by the court. Finally, it examines some open issues that were not addressed by the BGH and proposes their solution in light of the BGH’s judgment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Contract Law
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2025-2002
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Culpa in Contrahendo and Due Diligence in M&A Transactions

Georgios Papachristou
European Review of Contract Law
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Culpa in Contrahendo and Due Diligence in M&A Transactions

Georgios Papachristou
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the context of mergers &amp; acquisitions (M&amp;A) the seller and the buyer are engaging in a process called due diligence, during which information regarding the acquired company is disclosed. Usually this takes place through the creation of a data room by the seller and the uploading of documents there. A critical question here is how this process interacts with the seller’s duty of disclosure, namely the duty to disclose to the buyer material facts and issues related to the subject matter of the negotiated contract. Recently, this matter was addressed by the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (BGH). In its judgment the BGH takes the view that the extent to which the seller is performing his duty of disclosure through due diligence must be assessed by taking account of the individual facts of each case. This paper is analyzing the BGH’s judgment and provides a critical approach on certain positions adopted by the court. Finally, it examines some open issues that were not addressed by the BGH and proposes their solution in light of the BGH’s judgment.

European Review of Contract LawVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.