Quality control & numerical nonlinear material modelling for the load-bearing capacity of slender reinforced concrete columns - comparison of safety formats

Modern codes allow advanced nonlinear formats to calculate the bearing-buckling capacity of slender reinforced concrete column elements.In a previous part of this paper series, investigations of a priori collaborative Round-Robin tests of numerical simulations showed that the load capacity of slender single columns obtained by Nonlinear Finite Element Methods (NLFEM) is significantly overestimated when compared to experimental values.On the other side, the simplified formats adopted by design codes (e.g.nominal curvature-based method) provide too conservative results concerning the experimental derived bearing buckling capacity.The investigations are divided into two parts.Part I considers the experiments' findings and the nonlinear modelling.Part II aims twofold: (i) provide a quantitative comparison of the Eurocode column design rules with the international design regulations from the USA, China, Japan, and Canada concerning the safety and design format and (ii) identify possible strengths and weaknesses in the different approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21012/fc12.1104
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality control & numerical nonlinear material modelling for the load-bearing capacity of slender reinforced concrete columns - comparison of safety formats

Mohamed Soliman, Thomas Zimmermann, Alfred Strauß, Mohammad Farid Al Tamimi et al.
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Quality control & numerical nonlinear material modelling for the load-bearing capacity of slender reinforced concrete columns - comparison of safety formats

Mohamed Soliman, Thomas Zimmermann, Alfred Strauß, Mohammad Farid Al Tamimi, Benjamin Täubling-Fruleux, Lingfeng Zhu, Xin Ruan
article en

Abstract

Modern codes allow advanced nonlinear formats to calculate the bearing-buckling capacity of slender reinforced concrete column elements.In a previous part of this paper series, investigations of a priori collaborative Round-Robin tests of numerical simulations showed that the load capacity of slender single columns obtained by Nonlinear Finite Element Methods (NLFEM) is significantly overestimated when compared to experimental values.On the other side, the simplified formats adopted by design codes (e.g.nominal curvature-based method) provide too conservative results concerning the experimental derived bearing buckling capacity.The investigations are divided into two parts.Part I considers the experiments' findings and the nonlinear modelling.Part II aims twofold: (i) provide a quantitative comparison of the Eurocode column design rules with the international design regulations from the USA, China, Japan, and Canada concerning the safety and design format and (ii) identify possible strengths and weaknesses in the different approaches.

European Commission, Interreg
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.