Law and Global Governance of Infectious Disease: Access to Medicines on COVID-19, AIDS, and Beyond

Scientific advances to fight infectious diseases have been remarkable. International law and global governance have sought, and often failed, to keep pace, secure equity, and stop outbreaks. We trace the law and governance model emerging from early failure in the AIDS response and identify four elements: use of law by national governments to compel sharing; decentralized generic manufacturing; mechanisms for voluntary sharing of patents and technology transfer; international funding. In combination, these created a remarkable new ecosystem. We find that when COVID-19 hit and mRNA vaccines were rapidly developed, global North governments opposed mobilizing this synergistic model. Instead, equity efforts focused on financing purchase of vaccines from originator companies with little use of law. Amidst monopolies and scarcity of doses, vaccine nationalism fatally undermined this effort. Whether more synergistic law and governance emerges from rapidly changing global health law will likely dictate the efficacy of future global infectious disease response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.27
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Law and Global Governance of Infectious Disease: Access to Medicines on COVID-19, AIDS, and Beyond

Matthew M. Kavanagh, Luis Gil Abinader, Eli A. Friedman, Fatima Hassan
3 citations
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
9.39
article

Law and Global Governance of Infectious Disease: Access to Medicines on COVID-19, AIDS, and Beyond

Matthew M. Kavanagh, Luis Gil Abinader, Eli A. Friedman, Fatima Hassan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Scientific advances to fight infectious diseases have been remarkable. International law and global governance have sought, and often failed, to keep pace, secure equity, and stop outbreaks. We trace the law and governance model emerging from early failure in the AIDS response and identify four elements: use of law by national governments to compel sharing; decentralized generic manufacturing; mechanisms for voluntary sharing of patents and technology transfer; international funding. In combination, these created a remarkable new ecosystem. We find that when COVID-19 hit and mRNA vaccines were rapidly developed, global North governments opposed mobilizing this synergistic model. Instead, equity efforts focused on financing purchase of vaccines from originator companies with little use of law. Amidst monopolies and scarcity of doses, vaccine nationalism fatally undermined this effort. Whether more synergistic law and governance emerges from rapidly changing global health law will likely dictate the efficacy of future global infectious disease response.

The Journal of Law Medicine & EthicsVol. 53(S1)
Georgetown University (US), South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (ZA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.