Global Health Law: Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the Field

In the decade since the first edition of Global Health Law was published, the world has moved incrementally towards global health with justice, at least by one basic metric: life expectancy has edged up globally, with more rapid gains in low- than high-income countries. But to look around the world, global health with justice still seems a distant dream. Health gaps between people in rich and poor countries remain shocking and unconscionable-as do health inequities within countries. The pandemic also gave salience to profound health injustices-from injustices in access to lifesaving vaccines to gaping disparities in morbidity and mortality based on income, race, and national origin. So did the Trump administration's decision to pause, and then slash, foreign assistance, bringing an end to lifesaving programs around the world. Guided by the overarching theme of justice, these reflections canvass the history of global health law as a field and discuss developments and challenges in the field across four core themes: multilateralism; equitable distribution of the benefits of scientific advancement; global health law for the poly-crises; and human rights and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Health Law: Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the Field

Lawrence O. Gostin
2 citations
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Global Security and Public Health
8.40
article

Global Health Law: Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the Field

Lawrence O. Gostin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the decade since the first edition of Global Health Law was published, the world has moved incrementally towards global health with justice, at least by one basic metric: life expectancy has edged up globally, with more rapid gains in low- than high-income countries. But to look around the world, global health with justice still seems a distant dream. Health gaps between people in rich and poor countries remain shocking and unconscionable-as do health inequities within countries. The pandemic also gave salience to profound health injustices-from injustices in access to lifesaving vaccines to gaping disparities in morbidity and mortality based on income, race, and national origin. So did the Trump administration's decision to pause, and then slash, foreign assistance, bringing an end to lifesaving programs around the world. Guided by the overarching theme of justice, these reflections canvass the history of global health law as a field and discuss developments and challenges in the field across four core themes: multilateralism; equitable distribution of the benefits of scientific advancement; global health law for the poly-crises; and human rights and equity.

The Journal of Law Medicine & EthicsVol. 53(S1)
Georgetown University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Security and Public Health
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Health Law: Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the Field — Lawrence O. Gostin · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS