Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Community Meetings and Voter Control in Non-Democracies

How can autocratic leaders influence voters and entrench their rule? I analyze a Rwandan mandatory community program that requires citizens to participate in local community work every last Saturday of the month. Following the work, a centrally appointed government leader usually delivers a speech. I exploit cross-sectional variation in exposure to the meetings induced by exogenous rainfall fluctuations. I find that places with many rainy last-of-the-month Saturdays are significantly less likely to vote for the leading party. In terms of mechanisms, additional suggestive evidence points to the meetings likely being used to create an atmosphere of state control and supervision such that people feel more inclined to vote for the ruling party. These findings are also supported by anecdotal evidence and I rule out alternative explanations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00021158
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Community Meetings and Voter Control in Non-Democracies

Thorsten Rogall
Quarterly Journal of Political Science
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: Community Meetings and Voter Control in Non-Democracies

Thorsten Rogall
article en

Abstract

How can autocratic leaders influence voters and entrench their rule? I analyze a Rwandan mandatory community program that requires citizens to participate in local community work every last Saturday of the month. Following the work, a centrally appointed government leader usually delivers a speech. I exploit cross-sectional variation in exposure to the meetings induced by exogenous rainfall fluctuations. I find that places with many rainy last-of-the-month Saturdays are significantly less likely to vote for the leading party. In terms of mechanisms, additional suggestive evidence points to the meetings likely being used to create an atmosphere of state control and supervision such that people feel more inclined to vote for the ruling party. These findings are also supported by anecdotal evidence and I rule out alternative explanations.

Quarterly Journal of Political ScienceVol. 20(2)
Uppsala University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.