Hippocampal output suppresses orbitofrontal cortex schema cell formation

Both the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the hippocampus (HC) are implicated in the formation of cognitive maps and their generalization into schemas. However, how these areas interact in supporting this function remains unclear, with some proposals supporting a serial model in which the OFC draws on task representations created by the HC to extract key behavioral features and others suggesting a parallel model in which both regions construct representations that highlight different types of information. In the present study, we tested between these two models by asking how schema correlates in rat OFC would be affected by inactivating the output of the HC, after learning and during transfer across problems. We found that the prevalence and content of schema correlates were unaffected by inactivating one major HC output area, the ventral subiculum, after learning, whereas inactivation during transfer accelerated their formation. These results favor the proposal that the OFC and HC operate in parallel to extract different features defining cognitive maps and schemas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01928-z
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hippocampal output suppresses orbitofrontal cortex schema cell formation

Geoffrey Schoenbaum, Kauê Machado Costa, Jingfeng Zhou, Wenhui Zong et al.
6 citations
Nature Neuroscience
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
8.59
article

Hippocampal output suppresses orbitofrontal cortex schema cell formation

Geoffrey Schoenbaum, Kauê Machado Costa, Jingfeng Zhou, Wenhui Zong, Matthew Gardner, Zhewei Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Both the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the hippocampus (HC) are implicated in the formation of cognitive maps and their generalization into schemas. However, how these areas interact in supporting this function remains unclear, with some proposals supporting a serial model in which the OFC draws on task representations created by the HC to extract key behavioral features and others suggesting a parallel model in which both regions construct representations that highlight different types of information. In the present study, we tested between these two models by asking how schema correlates in rat OFC would be affected by inactivating the output of the HC, after learning and during transfer across problems. We found that the prevalence and content of schema correlates were unaffected by inactivating one major HC output area, the ventral subiculum, after learning, whereas inactivation during transfer accelerated their formation. These results favor the proposal that the OFC and HC operate in parallel to extract different features defining cognitive maps and schemas.

Nature NeuroscienceVol. 28(5)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (US), Beijing Normal University (CN), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Chinese Institute for Brain Research (CN), Concordia University (CA)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
8.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.