Commercial sprayer efficiency for application success on targeted weeds

Abstract Commercial targeted sprayer systems allow producers to reduce herbicide inputs but risks the possibility of not treating emerging weeds. Currently, targeted applications with the John Deere system have five spray sensitivity settings, and no published literature discusses the effects of these settings on detecting and spraying weeds of varying species, sizes, and positions in crops. Research was conducted in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, and North Carolina on plantings of corn, cotton, and soybean to determine how various factors might influence the ability of targeted applications to treat weeds. These data included 21 weed species aggregated to six classes with height, width, and densities ranging from 25 to 0.25 cm, 25 to 0.25 cm, and 14.3 to 0.04 plants m −2 , respectively. Crop and weed density did not influence the likelihood of treating the weeds. As expected, the sensitivity setting alters the ability to treat weeds. Targeted applications (across sensitivity settings, median weed height and width, and density of 2.4 plants m −2 ) resulted in a treatment success of 99.6% to 84.4% for Convolvulaceae , 99.1% to 68.8% for decumbent broadleaf weeds, 98.9% to 62.9% for Malvaceae , 99.1% to 70.3% for Poaceae , 98.0% to 48.3% for Amaranthaceae , and 98.5% to 55.8% for yellow nutsedge. Reducing the sensitivity setting reduced the ability to treat weeds. The size of weeds aided targeted application success, with larger weeds being more readily treated through easier detection. Based on these findings, various conditions can affect the outcome of targeted multinozzle applications. Additionally, the analyses highlight some of the parameters to consider when using these technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2025.36
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commercial sprayer efficiency for application success on targeted weeds

Michael M. Houston, Jason K. Norsworthy, Aaron G. Hager, Alan R. Vazquez et al.
6 citations
Weed Technology
Nematode management and characterization studies
10.50
article

Commercial sprayer efficiency for application success on targeted weeds

Michael M. Houston, Jason K. Norsworthy, Aaron G. Hager, Alan R. Vazquez, Wesley J. Everman, Bryan G. Young, Diego J. Contreras, Marcelo Zimmer, Lauren M. Schwartz‐Lazaro, Tristen H. Avent, William L. Patzoldt, Thomas R. Butts
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Commercial targeted sprayer systems allow producers to reduce herbicide inputs but risks the possibility of not treating emerging weeds. Currently, targeted applications with the John Deere system have five spray sensitivity settings, and no published literature discusses the effects of these settings on detecting and spraying weeds of varying species, sizes, and positions in crops. Research was conducted in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, and North Carolina on plantings of corn, cotton, and soybean to determine how various factors might influence the ability of targeted applications to treat weeds. These data included 21 weed species aggregated to six classes with height, width, and densities ranging from 25 to 0.25 cm, 25 to 0.25 cm, and 14.3 to 0.04 plants m −2 , respectively. Crop and weed density did not influence the likelihood of treating the weeds. As expected, the sensitivity setting alters the ability to treat weeds. Targeted applications (across sensitivity settings, median weed height and width, and density of 2.4 plants m −2 ) resulted in a treatment success of 99.6% to 84.4% for Convolvulaceae , 99.1% to 68.8% for decumbent broadleaf weeds, 98.9% to 62.9% for Malvaceae , 99.1% to 70.3% for Poaceae , 98.0% to 48.3% for Amaranthaceae , and 98.5% to 55.8% for yellow nutsedge. Reducing the sensitivity setting reduced the ability to treat weeds. The size of weeds aided targeted application success, with larger weeds being more readily treated through easier detection. Based on these findings, various conditions can affect the outcome of targeted multinozzle applications. Additionally, the analyses highlight some of the parameters to consider when using these technologies.

Weed TechnologyVol. 39
North Carolina State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Iowa State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nematode management and characterization studies
10.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.