Measuring the quality of collaborative group engagement: Development and validation of the QCGE self-assessment scale (QCGE-SAS)

Abstract Quality of collaborative group engagement (QCGE) is conceptualised as a complex, shared, and multidimensional construct critical to learning outcomes in collaborative learning. It is currently measured in a variety of ways, including rich observation-based methods. However, a standardised self-assessment method for the construct of QCGE has not yet been developed. This contribution presents a pragmatic self-assessment approach to QCGE for higher education contexts and a new self-assessment scale: the QCGE-SAS. Our findings from a study with N = 246 students support the four-factor structure of QCGE originally proposed by Sinha et al. (2015), namely behavioural, social, cognitive, and conceptual-to-consequential collaborative group engagement, and demonstrate that the QCGE-SAS can successfully capture the multidimensional nature of QCGE. Construct and criterion validity were supported by significant correlations with related scales and with self-reported and objective learning outcomes. However, while three subscales proved reliable, the social engagement dimension subscale showed unsatisfactory reliability, indicating further refinement of the scale in future research. Overall, our findings contribute to an accurate operationalisation of the QCGE construct and complement existing methods and comprehensive multi-method approaches to measuring QCGE, thereby informing CSCL research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09445-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the quality of collaborative group engagement: Development and validation of the QCGE self-assessment scale (QCGE-SAS)

Loris Jeitziner, Susanne Bleisch, Carmen Zahn, Oliver Rack et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
article

Measuring the quality of collaborative group engagement: Development and validation of the QCGE self-assessment scale (QCGE-SAS)

Loris Jeitziner, Susanne Bleisch, Carmen Zahn, Oliver Rack, Lisa Paneth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Quality of collaborative group engagement (QCGE) is conceptualised as a complex, shared, and multidimensional construct critical to learning outcomes in collaborative learning. It is currently measured in a variety of ways, including rich observation-based methods. However, a standardised self-assessment method for the construct of QCGE has not yet been developed. This contribution presents a pragmatic self-assessment approach to QCGE for higher education contexts and a new self-assessment scale: the QCGE-SAS. Our findings from a study with N = 246 students support the four-factor structure of QCGE originally proposed by Sinha et al. (2015), namely behavioural, social, cognitive, and conceptual-to-consequential collaborative group engagement, and demonstrate that the QCGE-SAS can successfully capture the multidimensional nature of QCGE. Construct and criterion validity were supported by significant correlations with related scales and with self-reported and objective learning outcomes. However, while three subscales proved reliable, the social engagement dimension subscale showed unsatisfactory reliability, indicating further refinement of the scale in future research. Overall, our findings contribute to an accurate operationalisation of the QCGE construct and complement existing methods and comprehensive multi-method approaches to measuring QCGE, thereby informing CSCL research and practice.

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningVol. 20(3)
University of Basel (CH), FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring the quality of collaborative group engagement: Development and validation of the QCGE self-assessment scale (QCGE-SAS) — Loris Jeitziner, Susanne Bleisch, et al. · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS