A Collaborative Engagement With Qualitative Scholar-Be(com)ing in the Neoliberal Academy

This paper unites three early qualitative scholars’ challenges to unsettle our narrow notions of “data” [gathering], ethics, and reflexivity as part of our qualitative scholarly be(com)ing. Inspired by tensions surrounding how we conceptualize/d “data [gathering]” and ethical inquiry during early scholarly endeavors. Whether our first inquiry endeavor (Author 3), inquiring with/in a place of employment (Author 2), or grappling with cross-cultural inquiry (Author 1); we draw on our projects to unpack notions of scholarly be(com)ing, critical reflexivity, and notions of knowledge as scholars embedded with/in the neoliberal academy. We highlight the multilayered nuances of conducting [early] qualitative inquiry that provoked opportunities to unsettle our onto-epistemological and methodological boundaries. This paper demonstrates our hope to (re)imagine inquiry differently and more expansively, reflecting a continuous scholarly be(com)ing that embraces more inclusive, messier lines of inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Qualitative Research
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447251334613
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Collaborative Engagement With Qualitative Scholar-Be(com)ing in the Neoliberal Academy

Ellen Moskowitz, Angela Kraemer-Holland, Jennifer Ramirez
International Review of Qualitative Research
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

A Collaborative Engagement With Qualitative Scholar-Be(com)ing in the Neoliberal Academy

Ellen Moskowitz, Angela Kraemer-Holland, Jennifer Ramirez
article en

Abstract

This paper unites three early qualitative scholars’ challenges to unsettle our narrow notions of “data” [gathering], ethics, and reflexivity as part of our qualitative scholarly be(com)ing. Inspired by tensions surrounding how we conceptualize/d “data [gathering]” and ethical inquiry during early scholarly endeavors. Whether our first inquiry endeavor (Author 3), inquiring with/in a place of employment (Author 2), or grappling with cross-cultural inquiry (Author 1); we draw on our projects to unpack notions of scholarly be(com)ing, critical reflexivity, and notions of knowledge as scholars embedded with/in the neoliberal academy. We highlight the multilayered nuances of conducting [early] qualitative inquiry that provoked opportunities to unsettle our onto-epistemological and methodological boundaries. This paper demonstrates our hope to (re)imagine inquiry differently and more expansively, reflecting a continuous scholarly be(com)ing that embraces more inclusive, messier lines of inquiry.

International Review of Qualitative ResearchVol. 18(4)
Kansas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Collaborative Engagement With Qualitative Scholar-Be(com)ing in the Neoliberal Academy — Ellen Moskowitz, Angela Kraemer-Holland, et al. · International Review of Qualitative Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS