Brokered Distances: Trust in Brokers within and Between Organizations

Organizational brokers, such as producers, diplomats, and middle managers, connect people within and across organizations. Trust in brokers promotes their effectiveness in connecting unfamiliar counterparts and transferring information between disconnected parties. Often, however, the very conditions that create the need for brokering, such as the existence of structural holes, undermine trust in brokers. We introduce an organizing framework to explain how fundamental features of brokering processes shape the perceived trustworthiness of brokers. Specifically, we describe how individuals make inferences about brokers’ ability, benevolence, and integrity based on the horizontal and vertical distances they bridge, the extent to which their brokering involves in-role versus extra-role behavior, and the extent to which they facilitate indirect versus direct exchanges between counterparts. Our model links situational features of brokering processes with established antecedents of interpersonal trust, thereby identifying challenges and opportunities for brokers and organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Psychology Review
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866251328917
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brokered Distances: Trust in Brokers within and Between Organizations

Nir Halevy, Maurice E. Schweitzer, Eileen Y. Chou, Emma Levine
12 citations
Organizational Psychology Review
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
28.39
article

Brokered Distances: Trust in Brokers within and Between Organizations

Nir Halevy, Maurice E. Schweitzer, Eileen Y. Chou, Emma Levine
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Organizational brokers, such as producers, diplomats, and middle managers, connect people within and across organizations. Trust in brokers promotes their effectiveness in connecting unfamiliar counterparts and transferring information between disconnected parties. Often, however, the very conditions that create the need for brokering, such as the existence of structural holes, undermine trust in brokers. We introduce an organizing framework to explain how fundamental features of brokering processes shape the perceived trustworthiness of brokers. Specifically, we describe how individuals make inferences about brokers’ ability, benevolence, and integrity based on the horizontal and vertical distances they bridge, the extent to which their brokering involves in-role versus extra-role behavior, and the extent to which they facilitate indirect versus direct exchanges between counterparts. Our model links situational features of brokering processes with established antecedents of interpersonal trust, thereby identifying challenges and opportunities for brokers and organizations.

Organizational Psychology ReviewVol. 15(2)
University of Chicago (US), University of Virginia (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
28.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.