Sorption of Sulfonamide Antibiotics in Peat Soils With Different Properties

ABSTRACT Background Sulfonamide antibiotics have been discovered as emerging pharmaceutical pollutants worldwide and are only poorly removed in wastewater treatment. At the landscape level, peat soils are significant water collectors and, thus, are sinks for organic pollutants. However, the fate of pharmaceutically active contaminants in peat soil is, as yet, largely unclear. Aim Factors regulating sorption as a dominant process that influences the filtering and buffering of the sulfonamides sulfadiazine (SDZ) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in different peat soils were investigated. Methods The sorption of SDZ and SMX was investigated in batch sorption experiments using peat soils with different physicochemical properties and under different land use, including sustainable wet peatland cultivation (paludiculture). Results Sorption K d values ranged from 21.39 to 102.8 mL g −1 for SDZ and 11.23 to 107.3 mL g −1 for SMX. Soil pH, organic carbon content, and C/N ratios were significantly correlated to sorption of the sulfonamides. Non‐linear regression analyses showed that the Freundlich isotherm model was generally best suited to describe sorption of both sulfonamides (0.54 ≤ R ≤ 0.98). Freundlich n values were generally different from 1 for both sulfonamides, indicating co‐mechanistic sorption as opposed to partitioning alone. A quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) constructed to predict sorption K d values showed a good cross‐validated performance ( R 2 adj = 0.79, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 8.71). Conclusions The sorptive capacities of peat soils for SDZ and SMX antibiotics are higher than those of many terrestrial soils. The quantity and stoichiometric properties of the organic matter fraction, as well as the pH conditions, significantly affect the ability of the soils to immobilize these antibiotics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202400516
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sorption of Sulfonamide Antibiotics in Peat Soils With Different Properties

Eric Oliang’a Mirenga, Sören Thiele‐Bruhn
3 citations
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
1.51
article

Sorption of Sulfonamide Antibiotics in Peat Soils With Different Properties

Eric Oliang’a Mirenga, Sören Thiele‐Bruhn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Sulfonamide antibiotics have been discovered as emerging pharmaceutical pollutants worldwide and are only poorly removed in wastewater treatment. At the landscape level, peat soils are significant water collectors and, thus, are sinks for organic pollutants. However, the fate of pharmaceutically active contaminants in peat soil is, as yet, largely unclear. Aim Factors regulating sorption as a dominant process that influences the filtering and buffering of the sulfonamides sulfadiazine (SDZ) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in different peat soils were investigated. Methods The sorption of SDZ and SMX was investigated in batch sorption experiments using peat soils with different physicochemical properties and under different land use, including sustainable wet peatland cultivation (paludiculture). Results Sorption K d values ranged from 21.39 to 102.8 mL g −1 for SDZ and 11.23 to 107.3 mL g −1 for SMX. Soil pH, organic carbon content, and C/N ratios were significantly correlated to sorption of the sulfonamides. Non‐linear regression analyses showed that the Freundlich isotherm model was generally best suited to describe sorption of both sulfonamides (0.54 ≤ R ≤ 0.98). Freundlich n values were generally different from 1 for both sulfonamides, indicating co‐mechanistic sorption as opposed to partitioning alone. A quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) constructed to predict sorption K d values showed a good cross‐validated performance ( R 2 adj = 0.79, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 8.71). Conclusions The sorptive capacities of peat soils for SDZ and SMX antibiotics are higher than those of many terrestrial soils. The quantity and stoichiometric properties of the organic matter fraction, as well as the pH conditions, significantly affect the ability of the soils to immobilize these antibiotics.

Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil ScienceVol. 188(3)
Universität Trier (DE)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.