Monasticism in the Middle Urals of the Synodal Period: Gender Characteristics and State Policy

This article examines the dynamics of the number and gender ratio of the Orthodox monasticism of the Middle Urals in 1722–1917. The research draws upon a set of office records from the archival collections of the Synod and Ural monasteries and legislation and reports of the Synod’s chief prosecutors. Regional data are compared with national statistics, which is important for the overall picture of the study. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the analysis considers the entire synodal period and the fact that the materials of the Middle Urals show the causes and nature of the changes that took place. As a result, it is possible to significantly correct the opinion prevailing in historiography that the reason for the prevalence of female monasticism was only the social status of women from the peasantry and the urban poor. The list of reasons was much broader: the regulation of the number of monasteries and monasticism, monastic tonsure, the introduction of the cenobitic rite, the ideological ferment of the early twentieth century, and wartime conditions. The numbers of Orthodox monasticism in Russia only reached the level of 1724 in 1912. Naturally, the ratio of male and female monasticism in the country (58 % monks, 42 % nuns) that had developed by the beginning of the period was due to the forms of material support for monasteries. This proportion was significantly disrupted by the staff reform of 1764–1788 and was restored only by the 1880s. The slight predominance of female monasticism by 1917 is explained by the fact that, unlike the beginning of the synodal period, convents had independent sources of income and longer traditions of communal life. The analysis is relevant in modern conditions of developing the legal status of monastery life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Quaestio Rossica
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2025.1.958
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monasticism in the Middle Urals of the Synodal Period: Gender Characteristics and State Policy

Marina Nechaeva
Quaestio Rossica
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

Monasticism in the Middle Urals of the Synodal Period: Gender Characteristics and State Policy

Marina Nechaeva
article en

Abstract

This article examines the dynamics of the number and gender ratio of the Orthodox monasticism of the Middle Urals in 1722–1917. The research draws upon a set of office records from the archival collections of the Synod and Ural monasteries and legislation and reports of the Synod’s chief prosecutors. Regional data are compared with national statistics, which is important for the overall picture of the study. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the analysis considers the entire synodal period and the fact that the materials of the Middle Urals show the causes and nature of the changes that took place. As a result, it is possible to significantly correct the opinion prevailing in historiography that the reason for the prevalence of female monasticism was only the social status of women from the peasantry and the urban poor. The list of reasons was much broader: the regulation of the number of monasteries and monasticism, monastic tonsure, the introduction of the cenobitic rite, the ideological ferment of the early twentieth century, and wartime conditions. The numbers of Orthodox monasticism in Russia only reached the level of 1724 in 1912. Naturally, the ratio of male and female monasticism in the country (58 % monks, 42 % nuns) that had developed by the beginning of the period was due to the forms of material support for monasteries. This proportion was significantly disrupted by the staff reform of 1764–1788 and was restored only by the 1880s. The slight predominance of female monasticism by 1917 is explained by the fact that, unlike the beginning of the synodal period, convents had independent sources of income and longer traditions of communal life. The analysis is relevant in modern conditions of developing the legal status of monastery life.

Quaestio RossicaVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monasticism in the Middle Urals of the Synodal Period: Gender Characteristics and State Policy — Marina Nechaeva · Quaestio Rossica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS