A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine

BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (<i>r</i> = -0.396; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rotation (<i>r</i> = -0.319; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (<i>r</i> = 0.456; <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251331123
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine

R.H.H. Wellenberg, Barend J. van Royen, Mario Maas, Geert J. Streekstra et al.
Acta Radiologica
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

A pre-clinical evaluation of geometrical stitching errors in a cone beam system: possible implications for weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine

R.H.H. Wellenberg, Barend J. van Royen, Mario Maas, Geert J. Streekstra, Anouk E Ree, Johannes G. G. Dobbe, J.C. Cool, Vesa Vahtila
article en

Abstract

BackgroundTotal body cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recently developed for both weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing CT imaging of the spine. Before whole-spine weight-bearing CT is used in clinical practice, potential errors must be addressed, such as the need to stitch multiple volumes due to the field-of-view limitations of CBCT technology.PurposeTo determine the geometric error of fused CBCT images of the spine using automatic stitching software.Material and MethodsIn total, 144 CBCT scans were obtained using three human cadavers. The geometric stitching error was determined in terms of total translation and rotation between vertebrae Th12 and L5, which were positioned in separate image volumes, with a regular spiral CT scan as a reference. The effect of cadaver size, radiation dose, and volume overlap between adjacent CBCT images on the stitching error was determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.ResultsThe median total translation and rotation error were 1.88 mm (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.48-2.42 mm) and 0.54° (IQR = 0.35°-0.63°), respectively. A weak negative correlation between the different volumes of overlap and total translation (<i>r</i> = -0.396; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rotation (<i>r</i> = -0.319; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was found, as well as a weak positive correlation between the cadaver size and total translation (<i>r</i> = 0.456; <i>P</i> < 0.001).ConclusionThe results of this cadaver study showed stitching errors in the order of 2 mm for translation and 0.5° for rotation in fused CBCT volumes of the spine. These findings function as a relevant step towards the clinical and quantitative application of whole-spine weight-bearing CT imaging.

Acta RadiologicaVol. 66(8)
Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), Planmed (Finland) (FI), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.