Required vs. Optional Study Guides: Exam Performance in Online Introduction to Psychology

Background Introduction to psychology disproportionately enrolls beginning college students with significant variability in study skills. Study guides are tools that may help students more effectively prepare for exams. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare exam performance for students who completed required versus optional study guides. Method Students ( n = 169) in asynchronous online Introduction to Psychology completed required study guides for three exams, while 86 students in a comparison section completed a required study guide only for the final exam, though study guides were available for all exams. To control for student motivation, regression analyses incorporated Learning Management System (LMS) engagement metrics, including participation rates, page views, and on-time assignment completion. Results Students in the required-guide group significantly outperformed those with optional guides. Regression analyses indicated that study guide completion contributed significantly to exam success even after accounting for the influence of Exam 1 and engagement. Conclusion Requiring study guides was associated with improved exam performance, even when controlling for motivation and prior exam scores. These findings suggest that completing a structured study guide may support student success in online courses. Teaching Implications Integrating required study guides into courses may improve exams independent of student motivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283251330917
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Required vs. Optional Study Guides: Exam Performance in Online Introduction to Psychology

Manda J. Williamson, Zein A. Saleh, Canyon Skare
Teaching of Psychology
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Required vs. Optional Study Guides: Exam Performance in Online Introduction to Psychology

Manda J. Williamson, Zein A. Saleh, Canyon Skare
article en

Abstract

Background Introduction to psychology disproportionately enrolls beginning college students with significant variability in study skills. Study guides are tools that may help students more effectively prepare for exams. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare exam performance for students who completed required versus optional study guides. Method Students ( n = 169) in asynchronous online Introduction to Psychology completed required study guides for three exams, while 86 students in a comparison section completed a required study guide only for the final exam, though study guides were available for all exams. To control for student motivation, regression analyses incorporated Learning Management System (LMS) engagement metrics, including participation rates, page views, and on-time assignment completion. Results Students in the required-guide group significantly outperformed those with optional guides. Regression analyses indicated that study guide completion contributed significantly to exam success even after accounting for the influence of Exam 1 and engagement. Conclusion Requiring study guides was associated with improved exam performance, even when controlling for motivation and prior exam scores. These findings suggest that completing a structured study guide may support student success in online courses. Teaching Implications Integrating required study guides into courses may improve exams independent of student motivation.

Teaching of Psychology
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.