Seasonal ecophysiology of two páramo species: the dominance of light over water limitations

Dry and rainy seasons in many ecosystems differ significantly in cloudiness, precipitation, and incident sunlight. These seasonal variations can influence photosynthesis by altering light availability and water stress. This study examines whether light availability or water stress is the primary limiting factor for photosynthesis in páramo plants during the dry and rainy seasons. We measured photosynthetic carbon gain per unit leaf area (<i>A<sub>n</sub></i> ), stomatal conductance (<i>g<sub>s</sub></i> ), chlorophyll fluorescence (ϕPSII), and leaf water potentials, in two dominant páramo species, <i>Espeletia grandiflora</i> and <i>Chusquea tessellata</i>, across both seasons. Photosynthetic light-response curves were generated for each species, and statistical analyses assessed the relative influence of environmental factors such as light, temperature, and vapor pressure deficit on An. Contrary to our expectations, An was higher in the dry season despite increased water stress, suggesting that light availability is a stronger driver of carbon assimilation. However, light-response curves showed that <i>Espeletia grandiflora</i> exhibited higher potential carbon uptake during the dry season, while <i>C. tessellata</i> had greater uptake during the rainy season. Statistical analyses indicated that light was the primary factor influencing <i>A<sub>n</sub></i> in both seasons, though temperature and vapor pressure deficit also played a role for <i>C. tessellata</i> in the rainy season. The combination of high solar radiation and elevated leaf temperatures in the dry season facilitated greater carbon assimilation, particularly in <i>E. grandiflora</i>. In contrast, the cloudier conditions of the rainy season limited photosynthesis despite reduced water stress. Although <i>C. tessellata</i> exhibited high <i>A<sub>n</sub></i> during the dry season, it appeared vulnerable to high radiation and desiccation. These findings emphasize that cloud cover and light availability, rather than water stress alone, are key drivers of páramo plant carbon uptake, with important implications for predicting climate change effects in high-altitude ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1529852
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal ecophysiology of two páramo species: the dominance of light over water limitations

Juan M. Posada, Adriana Sánchez, Lina María Mercado, William K. Smith
Frontiers in Plant Science
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Seasonal ecophysiology of two páramo species: the dominance of light over water limitations

Juan M. Posada, Adriana Sánchez, Lina María Mercado, William K. Smith
article en

Abstract

Dry and rainy seasons in many ecosystems differ significantly in cloudiness, precipitation, and incident sunlight. These seasonal variations can influence photosynthesis by altering light availability and water stress. This study examines whether light availability or water stress is the primary limiting factor for photosynthesis in páramo plants during the dry and rainy seasons. We measured photosynthetic carbon gain per unit leaf area (<i>A<sub>n</sub></i> ), stomatal conductance (<i>g<sub>s</sub></i> ), chlorophyll fluorescence (ϕPSII), and leaf water potentials, in two dominant páramo species, <i>Espeletia grandiflora</i> and <i>Chusquea tessellata</i>, across both seasons. Photosynthetic light-response curves were generated for each species, and statistical analyses assessed the relative influence of environmental factors such as light, temperature, and vapor pressure deficit on An. Contrary to our expectations, An was higher in the dry season despite increased water stress, suggesting that light availability is a stronger driver of carbon assimilation. However, light-response curves showed that <i>Espeletia grandiflora</i> exhibited higher potential carbon uptake during the dry season, while <i>C. tessellata</i> had greater uptake during the rainy season. Statistical analyses indicated that light was the primary factor influencing <i>A<sub>n</sub></i> in both seasons, though temperature and vapor pressure deficit also played a role for <i>C. tessellata</i> in the rainy season. The combination of high solar radiation and elevated leaf temperatures in the dry season facilitated greater carbon assimilation, particularly in <i>E. grandiflora</i>. In contrast, the cloudier conditions of the rainy season limited photosynthesis despite reduced water stress. Although <i>C. tessellata</i> exhibited high <i>A<sub>n</sub></i> during the dry season, it appeared vulnerable to high radiation and desiccation. These findings emphasize that cloud cover and light availability, rather than water stress alone, are key drivers of páramo plant carbon uptake, with important implications for predicting climate change effects in high-altitude ecosystems.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
University of Exeter (GB), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Wake Forest University (US), Universidad del Rosario (CO)
Wake Forest University, University of Exeter, Universidad del Rosario
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.