An Analysis of Language Style in Political Debate of Indonesian Presidential Candidate Of 2024

This research aims to identify various types of language styles and try to find the most dominant use of language styles in the political debates of the 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates using a sociolinguistic approach. This study uses a qualitative method. To obtain data, the author used a note-taking technique, namely taking notes. Because the data was in the form of words, it was analyzed by identifying, analyzing, and categorizing the data and noting the frequency of the most dominant types of language styles. Researchers also used Martin Joos's theory of language style types; five different language styles were studied. Frozen style is one of them, as are formal style, consultation style, casual style, and intimate style. The results of the research show that the types of language styles in political debates have a frozen style of 1 data, a formal style of 3 data, a consultative style of 35 data, then a casual style of 12 data, and finally the intimate style has 0 data. Based on the analysis, the author found that there are four language styles: frozen, formal, consultative, and relaxed. Then, the consultative style is the most widely used style, with 35 data points out of a total of 51 data points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language Education (JoLE)
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69820/jole.v3i1.276
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Language Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Language Style in Political Debate of Indonesian Presidential Candidate Of 2024

Jubilezer Sihite, Sadhana Manik, Nentriana Hutabarat
Journal of Language Education (JoLE)
Linguistics and Language Analysis
article

An Analysis of Language Style in Political Debate of Indonesian Presidential Candidate Of 2024

Jubilezer Sihite, Sadhana Manik, Nentriana Hutabarat
article en

Abstract

This research aims to identify various types of language styles and try to find the most dominant use of language styles in the political debates of the 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates using a sociolinguistic approach. This study uses a qualitative method. To obtain data, the author used a note-taking technique, namely taking notes. Because the data was in the form of words, it was analyzed by identifying, analyzing, and categorizing the data and noting the frequency of the most dominant types of language styles. Researchers also used Martin Joos's theory of language style types; five different language styles were studied. Frozen style is one of them, as are formal style, consultation style, casual style, and intimate style. The results of the research show that the types of language styles in political debates have a frozen style of 1 data, a formal style of 3 data, a consultative style of 35 data, then a casual style of 12 data, and finally the intimate style has 0 data. Based on the analysis, the author found that there are four language styles: frozen, formal, consultative, and relaxed. Then, the consultative style is the most widely used style, with 35 data points out of a total of 51 data points.

Journal of Language Education (JoLE)Vol. 3(1)
University of HKBP Nommensen (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Linguistics and Language Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Analysis of Language Style in Political Debate of Indonesian Presidential Candidate Of 2024 — Jubilezer Sihite, Sadhana Manik, et al. · Journal of Language Education (JoLE) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS