From Margins to Headlines: Analyzing the Determinants of Increased Media Focus on Income Inequality

ABSTRACT This study examines the determinants of media coverage on income inequality across nine OECD countries from 1980 to 2021, aiming to understand its increased salience after the Global Financial Crisis despite minimal changes in actual inequality trends. Using a novel dataset of over 400 million newspaper articles, we analyze the media coverage volume and tone, examining their relationships with economic fundamentals and extra‐economic factors. Our results show that economic fundamentals account for less than half of the variation in coverage, while the rise of populism and Piketty's book publication coincided with increased attention. The media focused more on market income inequality, potentially skewing public perception. The findings highlight the significant role of extra‐economic factors in shaping inequality coverage, emphasizing the need for political leaders to communicate economic successes more effectively given media tendencies to focus on negative developments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70024
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Margins to Headlines: Analyzing the Determinants of Increased Media Focus on Income Inequality

Florence Bouvet, Puspa Delima Amri
Social Science Quarterly
Media Influence and Politics
article

From Margins to Headlines: Analyzing the Determinants of Increased Media Focus on Income Inequality

Florence Bouvet, Puspa Delima Amri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the determinants of media coverage on income inequality across nine OECD countries from 1980 to 2021, aiming to understand its increased salience after the Global Financial Crisis despite minimal changes in actual inequality trends. Using a novel dataset of over 400 million newspaper articles, we analyze the media coverage volume and tone, examining their relationships with economic fundamentals and extra‐economic factors. Our results show that economic fundamentals account for less than half of the variation in coverage, while the rise of populism and Piketty's book publication coincided with increased attention. The media focused more on market income inequality, potentially skewing public perception. The findings highlight the significant role of extra‐economic factors in shaping inequality coverage, emphasizing the need for political leaders to communicate economic successes more effectively given media tendencies to focus on negative developments.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 106(3)
Sonoma State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.