Coopetition and sustainability performance: examining the impact of cognitive and behavioral mechanisms

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of cognitive and behavioral mechanisms on sustainability performance within the context of coopetition for sustainability. In particular, it investigates how coopetition importance, which underlies a coopetition-oriented mindset and coopetition intensity, which determines coopetitive behavior, influence sustainability performance, and what role a CSR policy plays in coopetition for sustainability. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative study was designed by applying a multi-actor perspective on coopetition for sustainability at the network level. Respondents included CEOs, managers and experts from organizations engaged in coopetitive practices within the housing sector in Poland. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed hypotheses. Additionally, cluster analysis was applied to delineate distinctive groups of organizations involved in coopetition for sustainability. Findings The results demonstrate that coopetition importance and coopetition intensity positively affect sustainability performance, highlighting both cognitive and behavioral mechanisms in coopetition for sustainability. Furthermore, a CSR policy serves as a critical regulatory factor, moderating the effect of coopetition intensity on sustainability performance. From the post hoc cluster analysis, this study identifies three distinct clusters of organizations based on their engagement in coopetition for sustainability: coopetition champions, sustainability stewards and cautious operators. Practical implications The study informs managers about the cognitive and behavioral mechanisms in coopetitive interactions that are central to achieving high sustainability performance. Furthermore, the study provides actionable guidance for managers, i.e. highlights specific practices, such as leveraging CSR policies, fostering coopetition importance as a part of the coopetition-oriented mindset and balancing cooperative and competitive behaviors to regulate coopetition dynamics and maximize sustainability outcomes. Originality/value The study advances the understanding of coopetition for sustainability by providing insights into the potential links between coopetitive mindset, behavior and outcome in this complex phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-02-2024-0103
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Business Strategy and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coopetition and sustainability performance: examining the impact of cognitive and behavioral mechanisms

Siarhei Manzhynski, Alina Źróbek-Różańska, Galina Biedenbach, Tatbeeq Raza‐Ullah
6 citations
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Business Strategy and Innovation
13.36
article

Coopetition and sustainability performance: examining the impact of cognitive and behavioral mechanisms

Siarhei Manzhynski, Alina Źróbek-Różańska, Galina Biedenbach, Tatbeeq Raza‐Ullah
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of cognitive and behavioral mechanisms on sustainability performance within the context of coopetition for sustainability. In particular, it investigates how coopetition importance, which underlies a coopetition-oriented mindset and coopetition intensity, which determines coopetitive behavior, influence sustainability performance, and what role a CSR policy plays in coopetition for sustainability. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative study was designed by applying a multi-actor perspective on coopetition for sustainability at the network level. Respondents included CEOs, managers and experts from organizations engaged in coopetitive practices within the housing sector in Poland. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed hypotheses. Additionally, cluster analysis was applied to delineate distinctive groups of organizations involved in coopetition for sustainability. Findings The results demonstrate that coopetition importance and coopetition intensity positively affect sustainability performance, highlighting both cognitive and behavioral mechanisms in coopetition for sustainability. Furthermore, a CSR policy serves as a critical regulatory factor, moderating the effect of coopetition intensity on sustainability performance. From the post hoc cluster analysis, this study identifies three distinct clusters of organizations based on their engagement in coopetition for sustainability: coopetition champions, sustainability stewards and cautious operators. Practical implications The study informs managers about the cognitive and behavioral mechanisms in coopetitive interactions that are central to achieving high sustainability performance. Furthermore, the study provides actionable guidance for managers, i.e. highlights specific practices, such as leveraging CSR policies, fostering coopetition importance as a part of the coopetition-oriented mindset and balancing cooperative and competitive behaviors to regulate coopetition dynamics and maximize sustainability outcomes. Originality/value The study advances the understanding of coopetition for sustainability by providing insights into the potential links between coopetitive mindset, behavior and outcome in this complex phenomenon.

Journal of Business and Industrial MarketingVol. 40(13)
University of Nottingham (GB), Nottingham College (GB), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), Umeå University (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Business Strategy and Innovation
13.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.