Improving pressure relief device (<scp>PRD</scp>) inspection intervals through critical industrial accident analysis and field investigation in Korea

Abstract In Korea, the inspection and maintenance intervals for pressure relief devices (PRDs) are determined by the installation's purpose and the substances being handled. The law mandates inspection frequencies ranging from one to four years, depending on the associated economic and safety risks. This study aims to assess whether the current legal requirements for PRD inspection intervals can be made more flexible, drawing on empirical data from incident case analysis, site visits, and surveys. We examined PRD installation and operating conditions through site visits to 65 workplaces and surveys of 117 workplaces and stakeholders to identify challenges related to PRD inspection cycle regulations and their practical applicability. Based on these findings, we propose moving from a regulated to a self‐regulated PRD inspection cycle, in collaboration with industry experts and government agencies. The results of this study are intended to support improvements in chemical process safety management policies in Korea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12683
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving pressure relief device (PRD) inspection intervals through critical industrial accident analysis and field investigation in Korea

Namkyung Oh, Byungtae Yoo, Minseo Nam, Dong‐Hyun Seo
Process Safety Progress
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Improving pressure relief device (PRD) inspection intervals through critical industrial accident analysis and field investigation in Korea

Namkyung Oh, Byungtae Yoo, Minseo Nam, Dong‐Hyun Seo
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Korea, the inspection and maintenance intervals for pressure relief devices (PRDs) are determined by the installation's purpose and the substances being handled. The law mandates inspection frequencies ranging from one to four years, depending on the associated economic and safety risks. This study aims to assess whether the current legal requirements for PRD inspection intervals can be made more flexible, drawing on empirical data from incident case analysis, site visits, and surveys. We examined PRD installation and operating conditions through site visits to 65 workplaces and surveys of 117 workplaces and stakeholders to identify challenges related to PRD inspection cycle regulations and their practical applicability. Based on these findings, we propose moving from a regulated to a self‐regulated PRD inspection cycle, in collaboration with industry experts and government agencies. The results of this study are intended to support improvements in chemical process safety management policies in Korea.

Process Safety ProgressVol. 44(2)
Korea National University of Transportation (KR), University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KR)
Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving pressure relief device (<scp>PRD</scp>) inspection intervals through critical industrial accident analysis and field investigation in Korea — Namkyung Oh, Byungtae Yoo, et al. · Process Safety Progress (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS