Men subject to supervision who sexually reoffend. A narrative literature review to identify factors which raise risk, and support desistance

Purpose This study aims to summarise the evidence regarding factors that signal raised risk of reoffending among men convicted of sexual offences under probation supervision in the community and, in doing so, identify means of better supporting desistance among this group. Design/methodology/approach A narrative literature review was conducted to identify factors associated with a greater likelihood of sexually reoffending while under supervision in the community. A search of electronic databases was conducted, sourcing literature from between 2000 and 2024. A total of 87 papers were identified and read for the review. Findings A series of factors were identified which are linked to a greater likelihood of sexually reoffending while under community supervision, including younger age, offence-related sexual interest, significant criminal history including history of burglary, antisocial orientation and high levels of childhood adversity. The evidence suggests that within our supervision and risk management, we should use a strengths-based approach, routinely reassess risk and needs using appropriate tools, be alert to periods of stress and change, attend to reintegration factors, ensure good communication between agencies, attend to a person’s full criminal history, observe behaviour in different settings and focus on defensible decision-making. Research limitations/implications There are limitations to this study; for instance, most of the studies included were retrospective, and studies of reoffending rates underestimate the true level of offending. Practical implications The review found a body of evidence on what managing risk well and promoting desistance look like. The implications contribute to supporting desistance in those being supervised in the community. Originality/value This review adds to the evidence base by its focus on providing practical guidance to staff supervising men convicted of sexual offences in the community to enhance the likelihood of desistance. Attending to the factors identified may make it more likely that we can spot when someone is struggling and provide the support they need to desist and not lapse back into offending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-11-2024-0103
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Men subject to supervision who sexually reoffend. A narrative literature review to identify factors which raise risk, and support desistance

Helen Wakeling, Kate Netten
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Men subject to supervision who sexually reoffend. A narrative literature review to identify factors which raise risk, and support desistance

Helen Wakeling, Kate Netten
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to summarise the evidence regarding factors that signal raised risk of reoffending among men convicted of sexual offences under probation supervision in the community and, in doing so, identify means of better supporting desistance among this group. Design/methodology/approach A narrative literature review was conducted to identify factors associated with a greater likelihood of sexually reoffending while under supervision in the community. A search of electronic databases was conducted, sourcing literature from between 2000 and 2024. A total of 87 papers were identified and read for the review. Findings A series of factors were identified which are linked to a greater likelihood of sexually reoffending while under community supervision, including younger age, offence-related sexual interest, significant criminal history including history of burglary, antisocial orientation and high levels of childhood adversity. The evidence suggests that within our supervision and risk management, we should use a strengths-based approach, routinely reassess risk and needs using appropriate tools, be alert to periods of stress and change, attend to reintegration factors, ensure good communication between agencies, attend to a person’s full criminal history, observe behaviour in different settings and focus on defensible decision-making. Research limitations/implications There are limitations to this study; for instance, most of the studies included were retrospective, and studies of reoffending rates underestimate the true level of offending. Practical implications The review found a body of evidence on what managing risk well and promoting desistance look like. The implications contribute to supporting desistance in those being supervised in the community. Originality/value This review adds to the evidence base by its focus on providing practical guidance to staff supervising men convicted of sexual offences in the community to enhance the likelihood of desistance. Attending to the factors identified may make it more likely that we can spot when someone is struggling and provide the support they need to desist and not lapse back into offending.

Journal of Criminal PsychologyVol. 15(4)
Evidence Based Research (United States) (US), RED Consulting (Norway) (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.