Legal Text Analytics for Reasonable Notice Period Prediction

Applications of deep learning (DL) to generate text embeddings and natural language processing (NLP) have shown wide success in semantic interpretations of domain-specific text data when applied to downstream tasks such as predicting the next word, information extraction for classification, analyzing social media feeds, classifying text, and creating compressed representations. While DL and NLP have been widely applied across numerous domains, researchers have recently begun to apply these techniques to the field of law due to the challenges in processing legal case descriptions. Attention-based models have shown promising results in predicting criminal charges using unstructured text as an input, but little work has been done on data representing the Canadian legal system, especially employment law. The legal field poses many challenges, such as the amount of legal data publicly available in Canada, the verbosity of judgments, the legal jargon used in judgments, and the subjectivity of outcomes that pose many challenges in processing legal text data. Many of the state-of-the-art systems require expensive hand-annotated labels that are often unobtainable. In this study, we investigate the prediction of reasonable notice for termination of employment in the field of law. To address these challenges, we propose domain-adapted BERT variations specifically trained for legal texts. We assess the performance of various attention-based and pre-trained models using human-typed summaries of legal judgment and present a detailed analysis of the data and the results to provide insights for further exploration in this area. Our approaches also provide interesting insights about this specific type of legal case focusing on employment law, given the subjective nature of judges and the variability in outcomes. Received: 15 August 2024 | Revised: 28 February 2025 | Accepted: 10 March 2025 Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at https://static.case.law/. Author Contribution Statement Jason Lam: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Yuhao Chen: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Farhana Zulkernine: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Samuel Dahan: Validation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewjcce52024104
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Text Analytics for Reasonable Notice Period Prediction

Samuel Dahan, Farhana Zulkernine, Jason Lam, Yuhao Chen
4 citations
Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering
Artificial Intelligence in Law
34.09
article

Legal Text Analytics for Reasonable Notice Period Prediction

Samuel Dahan, Farhana Zulkernine, Jason Lam, Yuhao Chen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Applications of deep learning (DL) to generate text embeddings and natural language processing (NLP) have shown wide success in semantic interpretations of domain-specific text data when applied to downstream tasks such as predicting the next word, information extraction for classification, analyzing social media feeds, classifying text, and creating compressed representations. While DL and NLP have been widely applied across numerous domains, researchers have recently begun to apply these techniques to the field of law due to the challenges in processing legal case descriptions. Attention-based models have shown promising results in predicting criminal charges using unstructured text as an input, but little work has been done on data representing the Canadian legal system, especially employment law. The legal field poses many challenges, such as the amount of legal data publicly available in Canada, the verbosity of judgments, the legal jargon used in judgments, and the subjectivity of outcomes that pose many challenges in processing legal text data. Many of the state-of-the-art systems require expensive hand-annotated labels that are often unobtainable. In this study, we investigate the prediction of reasonable notice for termination of employment in the field of law. To address these challenges, we propose domain-adapted BERT variations specifically trained for legal texts. We assess the performance of various attention-based and pre-trained models using human-typed summaries of legal judgment and present a detailed analysis of the data and the results to provide insights for further exploration in this area. Our approaches also provide interesting insights about this specific type of legal case focusing on employment law, given the subjective nature of judges and the variability in outcomes. Received: 15 August 2024 | Revised: 28 February 2025 | Accepted: 10 March 2025 Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at https://static.case.law/. Author Contribution Statement Jason Lam: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Yuhao Chen: Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Farhana Zulkernine: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Samuel Dahan: Validation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Journal of Computational and Cognitive EngineeringVol. 4(3)
Queen's University (CA)
Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Queen's University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.