Sensitivity analysis of the lithospheric magnetic field at satellite altitude: the effects of the inducing field and the shape of the magnetic lithosphere

As a means of quantitative interpretation, forward calculations of the global lithospheric magnetic field in the Spherical Harmonic (SH) domain have been widely used to reveal geophysical, lithological, and geothermal variations in the lithosphere. Traditional approaches either do not consider the non-axial dipolar terms of the inducing field and its radial variation or do so by means of complicated formulae. Moreover, existing methods treat the magnetic lithosphere either as an infinitesimally thin layer or as a radially uniform spherical shell of constant thickness. Here, we present alternative forward formulae that account for an arbitrarily high maximum degree of the inducing field and for a magnetic lithosphere of variable thickness. Our simulations based on these formulae suggest that the satellite magnetic anomaly field is sensitive to the non-axial dipolar terms of the inducing field but not to its radial variation. Therefore, in forward and inverse calculations of satellite magnetic anomaly data, the non-axial dipolar terms of the inducing field should not be ignored. Furthermore, our results show that the satellite magnetic anomaly field is sensitive to variability in the lateral thickness of the magnetized shell. In particular, we show that for a given vertically integrated susceptibility distribution, underestimating the thickness of the magnetic layer overestimates the induced magnetic field. This discovery bridges the greatest part of the alleged gap between the susceptibility values measured from rock samples and the susceptibility values required to match the observed magnetic field signal. We expect the formulae and conclusions of this study to be a valuable tool for the quantitative interpretation of the Earth’s global lithospheric magnetic field, through an inverse or forward modelling approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Planetary Physics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2025037
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity analysis of the lithospheric magnetic field at satellite altitude: the effects of the inducing field and the shape of the magnetic lithosphere

Kaifeng Zhao, Cenxi Yuan, Houpu Li, Shaofeng Bian et al.
1 citations
Earth and Planetary Physics
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
0.81
article

Sensitivity analysis of the lithospheric magnetic field at satellite altitude: the effects of the inducing field and the shape of the magnetic lithosphere

Kaifeng Zhao, Cenxi Yuan, Houpu Li, Shaofeng Bian, J. Gui, Pan Zhang, Yukun Li, Jinsong Du
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As a means of quantitative interpretation, forward calculations of the global lithospheric magnetic field in the Spherical Harmonic (SH) domain have been widely used to reveal geophysical, lithological, and geothermal variations in the lithosphere. Traditional approaches either do not consider the non-axial dipolar terms of the inducing field and its radial variation or do so by means of complicated formulae. Moreover, existing methods treat the magnetic lithosphere either as an infinitesimally thin layer or as a radially uniform spherical shell of constant thickness. Here, we present alternative forward formulae that account for an arbitrarily high maximum degree of the inducing field and for a magnetic lithosphere of variable thickness. Our simulations based on these formulae suggest that the satellite magnetic anomaly field is sensitive to the non-axial dipolar terms of the inducing field but not to its radial variation. Therefore, in forward and inverse calculations of satellite magnetic anomaly data, the non-axial dipolar terms of the inducing field should not be ignored. Furthermore, our results show that the satellite magnetic anomaly field is sensitive to variability in the lateral thickness of the magnetized shell. In particular, we show that for a given vertically integrated susceptibility distribution, underestimating the thickness of the magnetic layer overestimates the induced magnetic field. This discovery bridges the greatest part of the alleged gap between the susceptibility values measured from rock samples and the susceptibility values required to match the observed magnetic field signal. We expect the formulae and conclusions of this study to be a valuable tool for the quantitative interpretation of the Earth’s global lithospheric magnetic field, through an inverse or forward modelling approach.

Earth and Planetary PhysicsVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.