Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover

Abstract Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re‐analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (<0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10 −3 , suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two‐step experiment to further investigate our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024je008441
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover

David C. Catling, S. Viscardy, K. Zahnle
8 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Planetary Science and Exploration
9.24
article

Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover

David C. Catling, S. Viscardy, K. Zahnle
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re‐analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (<0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10 −3 , suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two‐step experiment to further investigate our findings.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(4)
Ames Research Center (US), Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BE), University of Washington (US), Earth and Space Research (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Planetary Science and Exploration
9.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.