Modeling the Consequences of Making a Court Decision Using Artificial Intelligence

In this article, the author examines the prospects and limitations of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in Russian civil proceedings, drawing a distinction between “forecasting” a likely case outcome and “modeling” the long-term consequences of judicial decisions. Particular attention is devoted to disputes affecting the interests of future generations (e.g., environmental or urban planning cases), where modeling can offer a more comprehensive view of potential risks. Despite the absence of a unified service capable of creat ing such models for judges, all necessary technologies—machine learning, deep learning, big data analytics, and integration with geographic information systems (GIS), among others—are currently available and evolving rapidly. The article also highlights foreign experience in using AI in civil justice and alternative dispute resolution. The author concludes that the proposed model ing mechanism is of practical value, providing courts with additional tools for thoroughly assessing circumstances that are significant for both present and future generations, while preserving judicial independence and impartiality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.118-126
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the Consequences of Making a Court Decision Using Artificial Intelligence

O. Yu. Fomina
1 citations
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Artificial Intelligence in Law
8.52
article

Modeling the Consequences of Making a Court Decision Using Artificial Intelligence

O. Yu. Fomina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, the author examines the prospects and limitations of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in Russian civil proceedings, drawing a distinction between “forecasting” a likely case outcome and “modeling” the long-term consequences of judicial decisions. Particular attention is devoted to disputes affecting the interests of future generations (e.g., environmental or urban planning cases), where modeling can offer a more comprehensive view of potential risks. Despite the absence of a unified service capable of creat ing such models for judges, all necessary technologies—machine learning, deep learning, big data analytics, and integration with geographic information systems (GIS), among others—are currently available and evolving rapidly. The article also highlights foreign experience in using AI in civil justice and alternative dispute resolution. The author concludes that the proposed model ing mechanism is of practical value, providing courts with additional tools for thoroughly assessing circumstances that are significant for both present and future generations, while preserving judicial independence and impartiality.

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)(2)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.