The Principle of Immediacy and the Source of Electronic Evidence

The text deals with the problem of defining the concept of “source of evidence” in the context of the use of electronic evidence in civil proce dure. The author notes that in the Russian science of civil procedure there is no clear definition of this concept yet. In foreign scientific works the source of electronic evidence is understood as a physical, analog or digital device capable of creating or storing information. However, in the author’s opinion, such a definition does not answer the question of what exactly the court needs to investigate. The author proposes to consider an electronic medium, such as a file or a web page, as the primary source of electronic evidence. This will allow to adapt the principle of immediacy to the modern conditions of consideration of civil and administrative cases. The text also raises the question of how exactly the court can examine electronic evidence. The author points out two ways: referring to the primary source or researching means of reproduction of evidence. A clear understanding of what exactly is the source of electronic evidence will allow to distinguish between these ways and develop rules for the study of electronic evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.175-180
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Principle of Immediacy and the Source of Electronic Evidence

A. D. Erzin
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

The Principle of Immediacy and the Source of Electronic Evidence

A. D. Erzin
article en

Abstract

The text deals with the problem of defining the concept of “source of evidence” in the context of the use of electronic evidence in civil proce dure. The author notes that in the Russian science of civil procedure there is no clear definition of this concept yet. In foreign scientific works the source of electronic evidence is understood as a physical, analog or digital device capable of creating or storing information. However, in the author’s opinion, such a definition does not answer the question of what exactly the court needs to investigate. The author proposes to consider an electronic medium, such as a file or a web page, as the primary source of electronic evidence. This will allow to adapt the principle of immediacy to the modern conditions of consideration of civil and administrative cases. The text also raises the question of how exactly the court can examine electronic evidence. The author points out two ways: referring to the primary source or researching means of reproduction of evidence. A clear understanding of what exactly is the source of electronic evidence will allow to distinguish between these ways and develop rules for the study of electronic evidence.

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)(2)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Principle of Immediacy and the Source of Electronic Evidence — A. D. Erzin · Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS