Comparison of Transfer Learning Performance in Lung and Colon Classification with Knowledge Distillation

This research aims to apply the knowledge distillation method to medical image classification, specifically in the case of lung and colon image classification using various transfer learning models. Knowledge distillation allows the transfer of knowledge from a larger model (teacher) to a smaller model (student), which enables more efficient model building without sacrificing accuracy. In this research, the DenseNet169 model is used as the teacher model. The student model uses several alternative transfer learning architectures such as DenseNet121, MobileNet, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and Xception. The data used consists of 25,000 histopathology images that have been processed and divided into training, validation, and test data. Data augmentation was performed to enlarge the dataset from 750 to 25,000 images, which helped improve the performance of the model. Model performance evaluation was performed by measuring the accuracy and loss value of each student model compared to the teacher model. The results showed that the student models generated through the knowledge distillation process performed close to or even exceeded the teacher model in some cases, with the Xception model showing the highest accuracy of 96.95%. In conclusion, knowledge distillation is effective in reducing model complexity without compromising performance, which is particularly beneficial for implementation on resource-constrained devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Health Informatics Research
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59247/jahir.v2i2.289
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ideological and Political Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Transfer Learning Performance in Lung and Colon Classification with Knowledge Distillation

Abdel‐Nasser Sharkawy, Purwono Purwono, Annastasya Nabila Elsa Wulandari, Aimar Yudhistira
1 citations
Journal of Advanced Health Informatics Research
Ideological and Political Education
2.10
article

Comparison of Transfer Learning Performance in Lung and Colon Classification with Knowledge Distillation

Abdel‐Nasser Sharkawy, Purwono Purwono, Annastasya Nabila Elsa Wulandari, Aimar Yudhistira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research aims to apply the knowledge distillation method to medical image classification, specifically in the case of lung and colon image classification using various transfer learning models. Knowledge distillation allows the transfer of knowledge from a larger model (teacher) to a smaller model (student), which enables more efficient model building without sacrificing accuracy. In this research, the DenseNet169 model is used as the teacher model. The student model uses several alternative transfer learning architectures such as DenseNet121, MobileNet, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and Xception. The data used consists of 25,000 histopathology images that have been processed and divided into training, validation, and test data. Data augmentation was performed to enlarge the dataset from 750 to 25,000 images, which helped improve the performance of the model. Model performance evaluation was performed by measuring the accuracy and loss value of each student model compared to the teacher model. The results showed that the student models generated through the knowledge distillation process performed close to or even exceeded the teacher model in some cases, with the Xception model showing the highest accuracy of 96.95%. In conclusion, knowledge distillation is effective in reducing model complexity without compromising performance, which is particularly beneficial for implementation on resource-constrained devices.

Journal of Advanced Health Informatics ResearchVol. 2(2)
South Valley University (EG), Harapan Bangsa Institute of Technology (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ideological and Political Education
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.