From Formalism to Algorithmization in Judicial Law Enforcement: Limits and Opportunities in the Context of Digitalization of Justice

The article is devoted to the analysis of formalism as a method of law enforcement and its impact on the justice system in the context of modern changes. The first part of the article examines the main disadvantages of the formal approach to judicial decision-making, such as lack of skills in correctly interpreting the law, flexibility, and failure to take into account the socio-historical context of society’s development. The other part explores the positive applied aspects of formalism, which provides clear regulation of material legal relations, establishing certain requirements for recording and formalizing the facts that generate, modify or terminate them, which is an essential prerequisite for automating decision-making in court and other available data processing technologies that can improve law enforcement and increase its accessibility. The possibilities of justice transformation in the context of a combination of traditional formal methods and modern approaches are explored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.126.2.051-063
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Formalism to Algorithmization in Judicial Law Enforcement: Limits and Opportunities in the Context of Digitalization of Justice

I. I. Chernykh, M. V. Samsonova
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

From Formalism to Algorithmization in Judicial Law Enforcement: Limits and Opportunities in the Context of Digitalization of Justice

I. I. Chernykh, M. V. Samsonova
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of formalism as a method of law enforcement and its impact on the justice system in the context of modern changes. The first part of the article examines the main disadvantages of the formal approach to judicial decision-making, such as lack of skills in correctly interpreting the law, flexibility, and failure to take into account the socio-historical context of society’s development. The other part explores the positive applied aspects of formalism, which provides clear regulation of material legal relations, establishing certain requirements for recording and formalizing the facts that generate, modify or terminate them, which is an essential prerequisite for automating decision-making in court and other available data processing technologies that can improve law enforcement and increase its accessibility. The possibilities of justice transformation in the context of a combination of traditional formal methods and modern approaches are explored.

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)(2)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Formalism to Algorithmization in Judicial Law Enforcement: Limits and Opportunities in the Context of Digitalization of Justice — I. I. Chernykh, M. V. Samsonova · Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS