Assessing Economic Outcomes of Recent Global Trade Adjustments

This study examines the uneven economic outcomes of the 2025 global tariff measures across different nations. Using a comparative macroeconomic approach, it identifies which countries have benefited from the new protectionist strategies and which have faced setbacks. Drawing on trade flow data, GDP growth indicators, and employment statistics, the paper analyzes both short-term shocks and longer-term structural effects. Particular attention is given to supply chain disruption, export competitiveness, and domestic production shifts. Through the lens of economic modeling and case-based analysis (e.g., the U.S., EU, China, and select developing economies), the article offers insight into trade diversion, market substitution, and policy backlash. The findings underscore the growing asymmetry in global trade relations and provide implications for policymakers navigating the next phase of economic nationalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Porta Universorum
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.010204
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Economic Outcomes of Recent Global Trade Adjustments

Bakhtiyar Mammadov
Porta Universorum
Global trade and economics
article

Assessing Economic Outcomes of Recent Global Trade Adjustments

Bakhtiyar Mammadov
article en

Abstract

This study examines the uneven economic outcomes of the 2025 global tariff measures across different nations. Using a comparative macroeconomic approach, it identifies which countries have benefited from the new protectionist strategies and which have faced setbacks. Drawing on trade flow data, GDP growth indicators, and employment statistics, the paper analyzes both short-term shocks and longer-term structural effects. Particular attention is given to supply chain disruption, export competitiveness, and domestic production shifts. Through the lens of economic modeling and case-based analysis (e.g., the U.S., EU, China, and select developing economies), the article offers insight into trade diversion, market substitution, and policy backlash. The findings underscore the growing asymmetry in global trade relations and provide implications for policymakers navigating the next phase of economic nationalism.

Porta UniversorumVol. 1(2)
Nakhchivan State University (AZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.