Feasibility of developing a new tool for assessing vaginal health in women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause; The VAN study

ObjectivesGenitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no accessible, objective clinical method with which to make a diagnosis of vaginal changes associated with GSM. We undertook a feasibility study to assess suitability of different objective diagnostic methods and obtained quantitative scores using a new GSM Assessment Tool (NGAT) and vaginal maturation vlue (VMV). These scores were correlated with patient reported symptoms obtained via a questionnaire.Study DesignVAginal Health - What's Normal (VAN) Study is a prospective, observational, feasibility study, evaluating NGAT and VMV. Sixty women (12 healthy controls and 48 symptomatic) were recruited and had a baseline assessment. The symptomatic women were offered treatment and had a second assessment 16 weeks later.ResultsCompared with control group, symptomatic women had higher NGAT and VMV scores at baseline. After treatment, in symptomatic women, symptoms improved and NGAT scores reduced, while the median value for VMV was unexpectedly reduced.ConclusionsThis data suggests that clinical assessment and accurate recording of GSM can be supported by an objective scoring system, particularly in primary care and warrants adequately powered future studies to assess the utility of these methods in clinical and research setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Post Reproductive Health
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20533691251332321
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of developing a new tool for assessing vaginal health in women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause; The VAN study

Dharani Kosala Hapangama, Nick Panay, Paula Briggs, Tim Hillard et al.
1 citations
Post Reproductive Health
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
1.29
article

Feasibility of developing a new tool for assessing vaginal health in women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause; The VAN study

Dharani Kosala Hapangama, Nick Panay, Paula Briggs, Tim Hillard, Steven Lane, Christopher P. Evans, Lora Kiosseva, J Drury
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectivesGenitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no accessible, objective clinical method with which to make a diagnosis of vaginal changes associated with GSM. We undertook a feasibility study to assess suitability of different objective diagnostic methods and obtained quantitative scores using a new GSM Assessment Tool (NGAT) and vaginal maturation vlue (VMV). These scores were correlated with patient reported symptoms obtained via a questionnaire.Study DesignVAginal Health - What's Normal (VAN) Study is a prospective, observational, feasibility study, evaluating NGAT and VMV. Sixty women (12 healthy controls and 48 symptomatic) were recruited and had a baseline assessment. The symptomatic women were offered treatment and had a second assessment 16 weeks later.ResultsCompared with control group, symptomatic women had higher NGAT and VMV scores at baseline. After treatment, in symptomatic women, symptoms improved and NGAT scores reduced, while the median value for VMV was unexpectedly reduced.ConclusionsThis data suggests that clinical assessment and accurate recording of GSM can be supported by an objective scoring system, particularly in primary care and warrants adequately powered future studies to assess the utility of these methods in clinical and research setting.

Post Reproductive HealthVol. 31(3)
University of Liverpool (GB), Poole Hospital (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Liverpool Women's Hospital (GB), Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital (GB), Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.