Measuring what matters: Evaluating the validity and reliability of teachers’ competency scales in China

This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of teacher competency scales in China, focusing on the Chongqing region. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the study utilizes Hay McBer's teacher-teaching competency model to evaluate three key domains: Value of Teacher Professionalism (VTP), Teaching and Learning Skills (TLS), and Classroom Climate (CC). A sample of 200 teachers was surveyed, and data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) through IBM SPSS and SEM AMOS programs. The methodology involved developing and validating a questionnaire based on expert consultations regarding face validity and content reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The findings reveal high reliability and validity across all dimensions, supported by strong expert consensus. EFA indicated that the first three components explained 87.944% of the total variance, with the primary component accounting for 80.552%. CFA confirmed the constructs' validity and reliability, with high loading factors, AVE, and CR values. The model fit indices suggested an adequate fit, with RMSEA within the acceptable range and strong incremental fit indices. This study provides a reliable and valid framework for assessing teacher competency in China, with practical implications for educational policy and teacher training programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring what matters: Evaluating the validity and reliability of teachers’ competency scales in China

Min Zhong, Mat Rahimi Yusof
1 citations
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Competency Development and Evaluation
2.44
article

Measuring what matters: Evaluating the validity and reliability of teachers’ competency scales in China

Min Zhong, Mat Rahimi Yusof
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of teacher competency scales in China, focusing on the Chongqing region. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the study utilizes Hay McBer's teacher-teaching competency model to evaluate three key domains: Value of Teacher Professionalism (VTP), Teaching and Learning Skills (TLS), and Classroom Climate (CC). A sample of 200 teachers was surveyed, and data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) through IBM SPSS and SEM AMOS programs. The methodology involved developing and validating a questionnaire based on expert consultations regarding face validity and content reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The findings reveal high reliability and validity across all dimensions, supported by strong expert consensus. EFA indicated that the first three components explained 87.944% of the total variance, with the primary component accounting for 80.552%. CFA confirmed the constructs' validity and reliability, with high loading factors, AVE, and CR values. The model fit indices suggested an adequate fit, with RMSEA within the acceptable range and strong incremental fit indices. This study provides a reliable and valid framework for assessing teacher competency in China, with practical implications for educational policy and teacher training programs.

Edelweiss Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 9(4)
Northern University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Competency Development and Evaluation
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.