A Comparative Study of the Concepts of “Obligation" and “Righteousness" in Chinese and Japanese Cultures

This paper takes Benedict’s The Chrysanthemum and the Sword as the starting point and employs a comprehensive analytical framework integrating comparative cultural studies, semiotics, and ethical typology to systematically investigate the historical evolution, cultural connotations, and translational mechanisms of the concepts of “obligation” and “righteousness” in Chinese and Japanese cultures. By constructing a three - level analytical dimension of “semantic field - pragmatic domain - cultural context,” this study reveals the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese views on “obligation” and “righteousness” and explores their transformation trends in the process of modernization, providing a new perspective and methodological paradigm for the comparative study of ethics in East Asia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/1j2e2z51
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of the Concepts of “Obligation" and “Righteousness" in Chinese and Japanese Cultures

Wenhui Peng
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Chinese history and philosophy
article

A Comparative Study of the Concepts of “Obligation" and “Righteousness" in Chinese and Japanese Cultures

Wenhui Peng
article en

Abstract

This paper takes Benedict’s The Chrysanthemum and the Sword as the starting point and employs a comprehensive analytical framework integrating comparative cultural studies, semiotics, and ethical typology to systematically investigate the historical evolution, cultural connotations, and translational mechanisms of the concepts of “obligation” and “righteousness” in Chinese and Japanese cultures. By constructing a three - level analytical dimension of “semantic field - pragmatic domain - cultural context,” this study reveals the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese views on “obligation” and “righteousness” and explores their transformation trends in the process of modernization, providing a new perspective and methodological paradigm for the comparative study of ethics in East Asia.

Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.Vol. 7(4)
Henan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.