Japanese Scholars' Perspectives on the Outlook on Life in Chinese Literature: A Case Study of Yoshikawa Kojiro and Rokuro Shiha

Yoshikawa Kojiro’s History of Chinese Poetry and Rokuro Shiha’s Loneliness in Chinese Literature, as pivotal works in the study of ancient Chinese literature in the field of Japanese sinology, focus on the outlook of life in ancient Chinese literature and present notably divergent conclusions. While both scholars share a relatively consistent view on the predominantly pessimistic tone of Literature in the Han, Wei, and Six Dynasties, their interpretations diverge significantly regarding Pre-Qin Literature and Tang Dynasty Literature. Yoshikawa argues that these two periods reflect an optimistic stance, contrasting sharply with Shiha’s emphasis on the deepening “aloneness” in literary works. By comparing the content and perspectives of these two works, it becomes evident that their structural frameworks warrant critical scrutiny, while their thematic focuses and periodization methods markedly differ from the approaches of domestic scholars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/dhff0e51
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Japanese Scholars' Perspectives on the Outlook on Life in Chinese Literature: A Case Study of Yoshikawa Kojiro and Rokuro Shiha

Yan Liu
Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.
Japanese History and Culture
article

Japanese Scholars' Perspectives on the Outlook on Life in Chinese Literature: A Case Study of Yoshikawa Kojiro and Rokuro Shiha

Yan Liu
article en

Abstract

Yoshikawa Kojiro’s History of Chinese Poetry and Rokuro Shiha’s Loneliness in Chinese Literature, as pivotal works in the study of ancient Chinese literature in the field of Japanese sinology, focus on the outlook of life in ancient Chinese literature and present notably divergent conclusions. While both scholars share a relatively consistent view on the predominantly pessimistic tone of Literature in the Han, Wei, and Six Dynasties, their interpretations diverge significantly regarding Pre-Qin Literature and Tang Dynasty Literature. Yoshikawa argues that these two periods reflect an optimistic stance, contrasting sharply with Shiha’s emphasis on the deepening “aloneness” in literary works. By comparing the content and perspectives of these two works, it becomes evident that their structural frameworks warrant critical scrutiny, while their thematic focuses and periodization methods markedly differ from the approaches of domestic scholars.

Scientific journal of humanities and social sciences.Vol. 7(4)
Beijing Language and Culture University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.