Examining the Relationship Between Different Dimensions of Subjective Well-being and Savings Behaviour: Insights From UK Panel Data

Abstract This paper examines the relationship between different dimensions of subjective well-being and savings behaviour. A conceptual framework based on Van Praag et al.’s (2003) two-layer model of well-being was empirically tested to investigate relationships among general life satisfaction, domain-specific satisfaction (health, income, leisure time, and job), and various measures of savings behaviour. Using panel data from the Understanding Society Survey covering British households between 2010 and 2018, this research determined that while general satisfaction positively correlates with savings behaviour, different satisfaction domains show varying relationships. Income and job satisfaction demonstrate positive associations with savings behaviour, whereas health and leisure time satisfaction show negative correlations. The core relationships remain stable even when the analysis is extended to include the non-linear effect of health satisfaction or the COVID-19 period, suggesting persistent patterns in how different aspects of well-being relate to financial decision-making. These findings suggest that approaches to understanding savings behaviour might benefit from considering multiple dimensions of well-being rather than relying on unified measures of general satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-025-10447-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Relationship Between Different Dimensions of Subjective Well-being and Savings Behaviour: Insights From UK Panel Data

Safaa Basabreen
2 citations
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
article

Examining the Relationship Between Different Dimensions of Subjective Well-being and Savings Behaviour: Insights From UK Panel Data

Safaa Basabreen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the relationship between different dimensions of subjective well-being and savings behaviour. A conceptual framework based on Van Praag et al.’s (2003) two-layer model of well-being was empirically tested to investigate relationships among general life satisfaction, domain-specific satisfaction (health, income, leisure time, and job), and various measures of savings behaviour. Using panel data from the Understanding Society Survey covering British households between 2010 and 2018, this research determined that while general satisfaction positively correlates with savings behaviour, different satisfaction domains show varying relationships. Income and job satisfaction demonstrate positive associations with savings behaviour, whereas health and leisure time satisfaction show negative correlations. The core relationships remain stable even when the analysis is extended to include the non-linear effect of health satisfaction or the COVID-19 period, suggesting persistent patterns in how different aspects of well-being relate to financial decision-making. These findings suggest that approaches to understanding savings behaviour might benefit from considering multiple dimensions of well-being rather than relying on unified measures of general satisfaction.

Applied Research in Quality of LifeVol. 20(3)
University of Liverpool (GB), Jazan University (SA)
Saudi Arabia Cultural Bureau in London, University of Liverpool
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.