Thirst Traps and Quick Cuts: The Effects of TikTok “Edits” on Evaluations of Politicians

TikTok and the associated technologies for recording and editing short-form video constitute a large and growing portion of online communication. Previous modalities of social media, including static images and especially text, engendered significant attention to the facticity of the communication: was a statement true or false? Did an event actually take place? For a certain genre of stylized, highly edited short-form video, this is beside the point—which is to produce a compelling video that portrays a prominent figure in a particular light. We conduct an experiment to evaluate whether “edits” of prominent politicians can change voter perceptions. We find that “thirst trap” edits cause an increase in perceptions of politician attractiveness and that “badass” edits improve overall evaluations of Donald Trump (but not Joe Biden). Descriptively, we present a distribution of the evaluations of the attractiveness of Trump, Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr (“RFK”), demonstrating significant variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Media + Society
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251329990
Citations
2
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thirst Traps and Quick Cuts: The Effects of TikTok “Edits” on Evaluations of Politicians

Kevin Munger, Valerie Li
2 citations
Social Media + Society
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
article

Thirst Traps and Quick Cuts: The Effects of TikTok “Edits” on Evaluations of Politicians

Kevin Munger, Valerie Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

TikTok and the associated technologies for recording and editing short-form video constitute a large and growing portion of online communication. Previous modalities of social media, including static images and especially text, engendered significant attention to the facticity of the communication: was a statement true or false? Did an event actually take place? For a certain genre of stylized, highly edited short-form video, this is beside the point—which is to produce a compelling video that portrays a prominent figure in a particular light. We conduct an experiment to evaluate whether “edits” of prominent politicians can change voter perceptions. We find that “thirst trap” edits cause an increase in perceptions of politician attractiveness and that “badass” edits improve overall evaluations of Donald Trump (but not Joe Biden). Descriptively, we present a distribution of the evaluations of the attractiveness of Trump, Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr (“RFK”), demonstrating significant variation.

Social Media + SocietyVol. 11(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thirst Traps and Quick Cuts: The Effects of TikTok “Edits” on Evaluations of Politicians — Kevin Munger, Valerie Li · Social Media + Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS