A Pilot Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Cognitive Distortions and Metacognition in Treatment-resistant Major Depression

Background: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has well-established effects on the hallmark symptoms of depression (e.g., DSM symptom criteria), yet it remains unknown whether other clinical phenomena are responsive, such as cognitive distortions and metacognitive disturbances that are central to psychological models of depression. Methods: The author assessed cognitive distortions and metacognition with two validated self-report measures (Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire, CDQ, and Metacognition Questionnaire, MCQ-30, respectively) in the first and final weeks of naturalistic TMS treatment in a continuous series of 20 outpatients with treatment-resistant major depression, along with two weekly self-report symptom measures (PHQ9 and IDS-30-SR). Results: Analysis of covariance (with Age, Gender and pre-treatment PHQ9 scores as covariates) showed significant effects of Time (p < 0.001), Scale (p < 0.001) and the Time-by-Scale interaction (p = 0.027). In post-hoc one-tailed paired t tests, each scale showed a significant decrease in mean score from First week to Final week. Clinical Responders (n = 10; defined as PHQ9 decrease ≥ 50%), compared to others (n = 10), showed numerically greater mean reductions in CDQ (36% vs. 18%; Cohen’s d = 0.62) and MCQ-30 (8% vs. 2%; d = 0.65). CDQ reductions were moderately correlated with PHQ9 reductions (r = 0.44) and IDS-30-SR reductions (r = 0.45); MCQ-30 reductions were minimally correlated with PHQ9 reductions (r = 0.09) and IDS-30-SR reductions (r = 0.22). Lower baseline CDQ scores were predictive of stronger outcomes on the PHQ9 (r = .62). Conclusion: TMS may remediate higher-order psychological processes such as cognitive distortions and metacognition in TRD, on a relatively short timescale and somewhat independent of symptom relief. The CDQ in particular may have unique, complementary and sensitive utility in monitoring TMS treatment effects in TRD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Depression and Anxiety
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5460.000098
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pilot Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Cognitive Distortions and Metacognition in Treatment-resistant Major Depression

Mair R.J.
Archives of Depression and Anxiety
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

A Pilot Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects on Cognitive Distortions and Metacognition in Treatment-resistant Major Depression

Mair R.J.
article en

Abstract

Background: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has well-established effects on the hallmark symptoms of depression (e.g., DSM symptom criteria), yet it remains unknown whether other clinical phenomena are responsive, such as cognitive distortions and metacognitive disturbances that are central to psychological models of depression. Methods: The author assessed cognitive distortions and metacognition with two validated self-report measures (Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire, CDQ, and Metacognition Questionnaire, MCQ-30, respectively) in the first and final weeks of naturalistic TMS treatment in a continuous series of 20 outpatients with treatment-resistant major depression, along with two weekly self-report symptom measures (PHQ9 and IDS-30-SR). Results: Analysis of covariance (with Age, Gender and pre-treatment PHQ9 scores as covariates) showed significant effects of Time (p < 0.001), Scale (p < 0.001) and the Time-by-Scale interaction (p = 0.027). In post-hoc one-tailed paired t tests, each scale showed a significant decrease in mean score from First week to Final week. Clinical Responders (n = 10; defined as PHQ9 decrease ≥ 50%), compared to others (n = 10), showed numerically greater mean reductions in CDQ (36% vs. 18%; Cohen’s d = 0.62) and MCQ-30 (8% vs. 2%; d = 0.65). CDQ reductions were moderately correlated with PHQ9 reductions (r = 0.44) and IDS-30-SR reductions (r = 0.45); MCQ-30 reductions were minimally correlated with PHQ9 reductions (r = 0.09) and IDS-30-SR reductions (r = 0.22). Lower baseline CDQ scores were predictive of stronger outcomes on the PHQ9 (r = .62). Conclusion: TMS may remediate higher-order psychological processes such as cognitive distortions and metacognition in TRD, on a relatively short timescale and somewhat independent of symptom relief. The CDQ in particular may have unique, complementary and sensitive utility in monitoring TMS treatment effects in TRD.

Archives of Depression and AnxietyVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.