COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF 0.1% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN VERSUS 0.05% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN IN PATIENTS WITH WARTS

Background: Warts are benign epithelial proliferations caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) and represent a frequent dermatological complaint. While many treatment options exist, intralesional bleomycin has emerged as a viable therapy, particularly for recalcitrant lesions. However, there remains variability in clinical response depending on concentration used, and standardized dosing protocols are still lacking. Identifying the most effective concentration with minimal adverse effects is essential to guide optimal clinical practice. Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of 0.1% versus 0.05% intralesional bleomycin in the treatment of common warts. Methods: This experimental study was conducted from July 2024 to January 2025 in the dermatology outpatient department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. A total of 60 patients with clinically diagnosed common warts were enrolled and randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A received intralesional bleomycin 0.1% and Group B received 0.05%. Following lesion paring and antiseptic cleansing, a single session of bleomycin was administered based on wart size. Patients were evaluated at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-treatment for resolution and adverse effects. Complete resolution was defined as the total absence of visible wart. Results: Group A had a mean age of 30.43 ± 11.18 years, while Group B had a mean age of 28.33 ± 11.38 years. Complete wart resolution was achieved in 27 out of 30 patients (90.0%) in Group A, compared to 20 out of 30 patients (66.7%) in Group B. The difference in clearance rates was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Intralesional bleomycin at a 0.1% concentration is significantly more effective than 0.05% for the treatment of common warts, offering higher resolution rates with minimal adverse effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/qsgzwa88
Primary Topic
Cancer and Skin Lesions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF 0.1% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN VERSUS 0.05% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN IN PATIENTS WITH WARTS

Sadaf Malik, Saba Naz, Aroosa, Alshifa Khan Afridi
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Cancer and Skin Lesions
article

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF 0.1% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN VERSUS 0.05% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN IN PATIENTS WITH WARTS

Sadaf Malik, Saba Naz, Aroosa, Alshifa Khan Afridi
article en

Abstract

Background: Warts are benign epithelial proliferations caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) and represent a frequent dermatological complaint. While many treatment options exist, intralesional bleomycin has emerged as a viable therapy, particularly for recalcitrant lesions. However, there remains variability in clinical response depending on concentration used, and standardized dosing protocols are still lacking. Identifying the most effective concentration with minimal adverse effects is essential to guide optimal clinical practice. Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of 0.1% versus 0.05% intralesional bleomycin in the treatment of common warts. Methods: This experimental study was conducted from July 2024 to January 2025 in the dermatology outpatient department of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. A total of 60 patients with clinically diagnosed common warts were enrolled and randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A received intralesional bleomycin 0.1% and Group B received 0.05%. Following lesion paring and antiseptic cleansing, a single session of bleomycin was administered based on wart size. Patients were evaluated at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-treatment for resolution and adverse effects. Complete resolution was defined as the total absence of visible wart. Results: Group A had a mean age of 30.43 ± 11.18 years, while Group B had a mean age of 28.33 ± 11.38 years. Complete wart resolution was achieved in 27 out of 30 patients (90.0%) in Group A, compared to 20 out of 30 patients (66.7%) in Group B. The difference in clearance rates was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Intralesional bleomycin at a 0.1% concentration is significantly more effective than 0.05% for the treatment of common warts, offering higher resolution rates with minimal adverse effects.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(2 (Health & Rehab))
Lady Reading Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Cancer and Skin Lesions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF 0.1% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN VERSUS 0.05% INTRALESIONAL BLEOMYCIN IN PATIENTS WITH WARTS — Sadaf Malik, Saba Naz, et al. · Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS