Using a Paradox Approach to Explore Work–Nonwork Issues

The interface between work and nonwork domains is often presented as dilemmas, that is, ‘either/or’ decisions involving mutually exclusive choices where individuals must prioritize one option over the other. We propose a values-based paradox approach that conceptualizes work–nonwork issues through a ‘both/and’ lens, that is, a lens that allows individuals to see two seemingly opposing beliefs or approaches to both be true and beneficial. Focusing on the popular work-nonwork construct of work–nonwork conflict, we use a values-based paradox approach to explore the embedded work–nonwork tensions that have heretofore been approached with either/or thinking. An important benefit of this approach to work–nonwork issues is that it accommodates different situational contexts (e.g., different societal cultures) and thus provides an adaptable, inclusive approach to exploring work–nonwork issues. Our goal is to show how using a paradox approach can lead to a deeper understanding of underlying value dimensions, which allows individuals to frame and develop sustainable work-nonwork solutions. We conclude by discussing several benefits of a values-based paradox approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Values
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858251328813
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Paradox Approach to Explore Work–Nonwork Issues

Sue R. Faerman, Sue A. Epstein
Journal of Human Values
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Using a Paradox Approach to Explore Work–Nonwork Issues

Sue R. Faerman, Sue A. Epstein
article en

Abstract

The interface between work and nonwork domains is often presented as dilemmas, that is, ‘either/or’ decisions involving mutually exclusive choices where individuals must prioritize one option over the other. We propose a values-based paradox approach that conceptualizes work–nonwork issues through a ‘both/and’ lens, that is, a lens that allows individuals to see two seemingly opposing beliefs or approaches to both be true and beneficial. Focusing on the popular work-nonwork construct of work–nonwork conflict, we use a values-based paradox approach to explore the embedded work–nonwork tensions that have heretofore been approached with either/or thinking. An important benefit of this approach to work–nonwork issues is that it accommodates different situational contexts (e.g., different societal cultures) and thus provides an adaptable, inclusive approach to exploring work–nonwork issues. Our goal is to show how using a paradox approach can lead to a deeper understanding of underlying value dimensions, which allows individuals to frame and develop sustainable work-nonwork solutions. We conclude by discussing several benefits of a values-based paradox approach.

Journal of Human ValuesVol. 31(3)
Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Empire State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using a Paradox Approach to Explore Work–Nonwork Issues — Sue R. Faerman, Sue A. Epstein · Journal of Human Values (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS