First‐Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1‐Year Follow‐Up of the <scp>FIRST</scp>‐Dx Study

The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1-21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (n = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (n = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (n = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (n = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (n = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Science
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70077
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First‐Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1‐Year Follow‐Up of the FIRST‐Dx Study

Katsutoshi Oda, Ryuji Hayashi, Sadakatsu Ikeda, Hidenori Kage et al.
5 citations
Cancer Science
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
4.68
article

First‐Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1‐Year Follow‐Up of the FIRST‐Dx Study

Katsutoshi Oda, Ryuji Hayashi, Sadakatsu Ikeda, Hidenori Kage, Manabu Muto, Tomohiro Kondo, Shinya Kajiura, Kei Muro, Masahiro Yoshioka, Reiko Ashida, Hiromichi Ebi, Masayuki Kitano, Junichi Matsubara, Kumi Mukai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1-21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (n = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (n = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (n = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (n = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (n = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041.

Cancer ScienceVol. 116(7)
Wakayama Medical University (JP), University of Tokyo Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), Toyama University Hospital (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP), Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (JP)
Chugai Pharmaceutical
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
4.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.