Lessons from 13 years of accelerometry measurements in five Brazilian cohorts: methodological aspects

This study describes key methodological decisions and their justifications for accelerometer data collection, processing, and cleaning/analysis in Pelotas (Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil) cohorts, exemplifying how research using sensor monitors could be carried out in a middle-income country context. This is a descriptive methodological study using raw accelerometer data from five Brazilian population-based cohorts with 32,963 individuals. Data collection (pre-processing decisions), processing (choosing requirements to run the analysis), and post-processing decisions (data cleaning) are described in detail. Pre-processing includes choosing the device brand/model, placement of the device, algorithms/thresholds, and the number of days participants were required to wear the devices. Processing activities involve applying thresholds/algorithms to the data. Finally, post-processing includes data cleaning. The minimum number of days to be validated to correctly estimate weekly averages was specific to age and measurement. By summarizing and describing the methodological decisions and analysis protocol, we hope to contribute to the design and analysis of accelerometer data in future studies in similar research contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311xen011724
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons from 13 years of accelerometry measurements in five Brazilian cohorts: methodological aspects

Pedro Curi Hallal, Renata de Lima Contreira, Helen Gonçalves, Ana Maria Baptista Menezes et al.
1 citations
Cadernos de Saúde Pública
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
1.88
article

Lessons from 13 years of accelerometry measurements in five Brazilian cohorts: methodological aspects

Pedro Curi Hallal, Renata de Lima Contreira, Helen Gonçalves, Ana Maria Baptista Menezes, Renata Moraes Bielemann, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Luciana Tovo‐Rodrigues, Bernardo Lessa Horta, Grégore Iven Mielke, Alícia Matijasevich, Giulia Salaberry Leite, Iná S. Santos, Marlos Rodrigues Domingues, Fernando C. Wehrmeister, Janaína Vieira dos Santos Motta, Ulf Ekelund, Andrea Wendt, Fernando Pires Hartwig, Inácio Crochemore‐Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study describes key methodological decisions and their justifications for accelerometer data collection, processing, and cleaning/analysis in Pelotas (Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil) cohorts, exemplifying how research using sensor monitors could be carried out in a middle-income country context. This is a descriptive methodological study using raw accelerometer data from five Brazilian population-based cohorts with 32,963 individuals. Data collection (pre-processing decisions), processing (choosing requirements to run the analysis), and post-processing decisions (data cleaning) are described in detail. Pre-processing includes choosing the device brand/model, placement of the device, algorithms/thresholds, and the number of days participants were required to wear the devices. Processing activities involve applying thresholds/algorithms to the data. Finally, post-processing includes data cleaning. The minimum number of days to be validated to correctly estimate weekly averages was specific to age and measurement. By summarizing and describing the methodological decisions and analysis protocol, we hope to contribute to the design and analysis of accelerometer data in future studies in similar research contexts.

Cadernos de Saúde PúblicaVol. 41(3)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), The University of Queensland (AU), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.