Evidence synthesis to guide systematic candidate drug prioritisation for repurposing in clinical trials of neurodegenerative diseases.

<p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" dir="auto" id="d6280958e184">Together, neurodegenerative diseases are a leading and increasingly common cause of disability in our aging population. Despite extensive research and investment, and numerous drugs with promising laboratory data, treatment options remain limited and cure elusive. Drug development has been characterised by high costs and failure rates, and lengthy timelines. With innovations in clinical trial designs promising more efficient clinical evaluation of pipelines of candidate drugs, it is also crucial to rethink how candidate drugs are selected for trials. With the use of derisked compounds, drug repurposing potentially provides time and cost efficiencies in drug development. To inform systematic evidence-based approaches in prioritising candidate drugs for repurposing in neurodegenerative diseases, we identify, evaluate, and report evidence from: (i) published literature via machine learning assisted systematic reviews of clinical studies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia, Huntington’s disease, motor neuron disease (MND), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson’s disease; animal studies; and in vitro studies, including using Systematic Online Living Summaries (SOLES); (ii) in-house experimental high throughput drug screening; (iii) pathway and network analysis; (iv) mining drug and trial databases. We report living evidence summaries with interactive web applications and drug CVs to inform expert panel decisions. We applied earlier versions of this framework to drug selection for progressive MS in MS-SMART (ISRCTN28440672) and for MND in the first three arms of MND-SMART (NCT04302870). We plan to continue to develop and improve the framework and inform ongoing drug selection in multi-arm multi-stage trials in various conditions including MND, AD, progressive MS and cerebral small vessel disease. Incorporation of additional data domains and more efficient artificial intelligence tools will enable more efficient, broad-scope, scalable evidence synthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14293/idr.25.004cw
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence synthesis to guide systematic candidate drug prioritisation for repurposing in clinical trials of neurodegenerative diseases.

Joanna Marguerite Wardlaw, Jeremy Chataway, Paresh Malhotra, Charis Wong et al.
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Evidence synthesis to guide systematic candidate drug prioritisation for repurposing in clinical trials of neurodegenerative diseases.

Joanna Marguerite Wardlaw, Jeremy Chataway, Paresh Malhotra, Charis Wong, Suzanne Reeves, Siddharthan Chandran, Anna Williams, Philip M. Bath, Denise Fitzgerald, Suvankar Pal, Malcolm Macleod, Max Parmar
article en

Abstract

<p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" dir="auto" id="d6280958e184">Together, neurodegenerative diseases are a leading and increasingly common cause of disability in our aging population. Despite extensive research and investment, and numerous drugs with promising laboratory data, treatment options remain limited and cure elusive. Drug development has been characterised by high costs and failure rates, and lengthy timelines. With innovations in clinical trial designs promising more efficient clinical evaluation of pipelines of candidate drugs, it is also crucial to rethink how candidate drugs are selected for trials. With the use of derisked compounds, drug repurposing potentially provides time and cost efficiencies in drug development. To inform systematic evidence-based approaches in prioritising candidate drugs for repurposing in neurodegenerative diseases, we identify, evaluate, and report evidence from: (i) published literature via machine learning assisted systematic reviews of clinical studies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia, Huntington’s disease, motor neuron disease (MND), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson’s disease; animal studies; and in vitro studies, including using Systematic Online Living Summaries (SOLES); (ii) in-house experimental high throughput drug screening; (iii) pathway and network analysis; (iv) mining drug and trial databases. We report living evidence summaries with interactive web applications and drug CVs to inform expert panel decisions. We applied earlier versions of this framework to drug selection for progressive MS in MS-SMART (ISRCTN28440672) and for MND in the first three arms of MND-SMART (NCT04302870). We plan to continue to develop and improve the framework and inform ongoing drug selection in multi-arm multi-stage trials in various conditions including MND, AD, progressive MS and cerebral small vessel disease. Incorporation of additional data domains and more efficient artificial intelligence tools will enable more efficient, broad-scope, scalable evidence synthesis.

University of Nottingham (GB), MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.