Where Will <scp>AI</scp> Take Scholarly Communication? Voices From the Research Frontline

ABSTRACT Early career researchers (ECRs) are in an ideal position to soothsay. Yet, much of what we know about the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) comes from vested interest groups, such as publishers, tech companies and industry leaders, which are strong on hyperbole, are superficial and, at best, narrow surveys. This paper seeks to redress this by providing deep empirical data from researchers, allowing us to hear researchers' views and ‘voices’. The data comes from a project, which focuses on the impact of AI on scholarly communications. From this study, we report on the perceived transformations to the scholarly communications system by AI and other forces. We were especially interested in discovering what future ECRs foresaw for the established pillars of the system—journals and libraries. The interview‐based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. The main findings being that while the large majority thought there would be a transformation there was no consensus as to what a transformation would look like, but there was agreement on it being one shaped by AI. The future appears rosy for journals, but less so for libraries and, importantly, for most ECRs, too.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learned Publishing
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2008
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Will AI Take Scholarly Communication? Voices From the Research Frontline

Jorge Manuel Rias Revez, Marzena Świgoń, Abdullah Abrizah, Anthony Watkinson et al.
3 citations
Learned Publishing
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Where Will AI Take Scholarly Communication? Voices From the Research Frontline

Jorge Manuel Rias Revez, Marzena Świgoń, Abdullah Abrizah, Anthony Watkinson, David M. Nicholas, Eti Herman, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, Jie Xu, David Clark
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Early career researchers (ECRs) are in an ideal position to soothsay. Yet, much of what we know about the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) comes from vested interest groups, such as publishers, tech companies and industry leaders, which are strong on hyperbole, are superficial and, at best, narrow surveys. This paper seeks to redress this by providing deep empirical data from researchers, allowing us to hear researchers' views and ‘voices’. The data comes from a project, which focuses on the impact of AI on scholarly communications. From this study, we report on the perceived transformations to the scholarly communications system by AI and other forces. We were especially interested in discovering what future ECRs foresaw for the established pillars of the system—journals and libraries. The interview‐based study covers a convenience sample of 91 ECRs from all disciplines and half a dozen countries. The main findings being that while the large majority thought there would be a transformation there was no consensus as to what a transformation would look like, but there was agreement on it being one shaped by AI. The future appears rosy for journals, but less so for libraries and, importantly, for most ECRs, too.

Learned PublishingVol. 38(2)
University of Lisbon (PT), University of Malaya (MY), Wuhan University (CN), Organic Research Centre (GB), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), Universidad de León (ES)
Universiti Malaya, Universidade de Lisboa, Wuhan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.