The Inequity of Opt-in Educational Resources and an Intervention to Increase Equitable Access

Billions of dollars are invested in opt-in educational resources to support struggling students. Yet there is no guarantee these students will use these resources. We report results from a school system’s implementation of on-demand tutoring. The take-up was low. At baseline, only 19% of students ever accessed the platform, and low-performing students were even less likely to log in. We conducted a randomized controlled trial ( N = 4,763) testing behaviorally informed messages directed at students and/or their parents to increase participation. Communications to students alone had no impact, whereas those to parents and students together increased usage by 46%. We found suggestive evidence that receiving these communications led to a four-percentage point decrease in course failures. Nonetheless, take-up remained low, highlighting that opt-in resources may increase—instead of reduce—inequality. Without targeted outreach, opt-in educational resources are unlikely to reach many students who could benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Researcher
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x251331518
Citations
4
Primary Topic
ICT Impact and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Inequity of Opt-in Educational Resources and an Intervention to Increase Equitable Access

Susanna Loeb, Carly D. Robinson, Biraj Bisht
4 citations
Educational Researcher
ICT Impact and Policies
1.14
article

The Inequity of Opt-in Educational Resources and an Intervention to Increase Equitable Access

Susanna Loeb, Carly D. Robinson, Biraj Bisht
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Billions of dollars are invested in opt-in educational resources to support struggling students. Yet there is no guarantee these students will use these resources. We report results from a school system’s implementation of on-demand tutoring. The take-up was low. At baseline, only 19% of students ever accessed the platform, and low-performing students were even less likely to log in. We conducted a randomized controlled trial ( N = 4,763) testing behaviorally informed messages directed at students and/or their parents to increase participation. Communications to students alone had no impact, whereas those to parents and students together increased usage by 46%. We found suggestive evidence that receiving these communications led to a four-percentage point decrease in course failures. Nonetheless, take-up remained low, highlighting that opt-in resources may increase—instead of reduce—inequality. Without targeted outreach, opt-in educational resources are unlikely to reach many students who could benefit.

Educational ResearcherVol. 54(6)
University of California, Irvine (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
ICT Impact and Policies
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Inequity of Opt-in Educational Resources and an Intervention to Increase Equitable Access — Susanna Loeb, Carly D. Robinson, et al. · Educational Researcher (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS