Towards whole brain mapping of the hemodynamic response function

Functional magnetic resonance imaging time-series are conventionally processed by linear modelling the evoked response as the convolution of the experimental conditions with a stereotyped hemodynamic response function (HRF). However, the neural signal in response to a stimulus can vary according to task, brain region, and subject-specific conditions. Moreover, HRF shape has been suggested to carry physiological information. The BOLD signal across a range of sensorial and cognitive tasks was fitted using a sine series expansion, and modelled signals were deconvolved, thus giving rise to a task-specific deconvolved HRF (dHRF), which was characterized in terms of amplitude, latency, time-to-peak and full-width at half maximum for each task. We found that the BOLD response shape changes not only across activated regions and tasks, but also across subjects despite the age homogeneity of the cohort. Largest variabilities were observed in mean amplitude and latency across tasks and regions, while time-to-peak and full width at half maximum were relatively more consistent. Additionally, the dHRF was found to deviate from canonicity in several brain regions. Our results suggest that the choice of a standard, uniform HRF may be not optimal for all fMRI analyses and may lead to model misspecifications and statistical bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x251325413
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards whole brain mapping of the hemodynamic response function

Mauro DiNuzzo, Fabio Mangini, Marta Moraschi, Daniele Mascali et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
1.43
article

Towards whole brain mapping of the hemodynamic response function

Mauro DiNuzzo, Fabio Mangini, Marta Moraschi, Daniele Mascali, Federico Giove, Michela Fratini, María Guidi, Fabrizio Frezza, Silvia Mangia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging time-series are conventionally processed by linear modelling the evoked response as the convolution of the experimental conditions with a stereotyped hemodynamic response function (HRF). However, the neural signal in response to a stimulus can vary according to task, brain region, and subject-specific conditions. Moreover, HRF shape has been suggested to carry physiological information. The BOLD signal across a range of sensorial and cognitive tasks was fitted using a sine series expansion, and modelled signals were deconvolved, thus giving rise to a task-specific deconvolved HRF (dHRF), which was characterized in terms of amplitude, latency, time-to-peak and full-width at half maximum for each task. We found that the BOLD response shape changes not only across activated regions and tasks, but also across subjects despite the age homogeneity of the cohort. Largest variabilities were observed in mean amplitude and latency across tasks and regions, while time-to-peak and full width at half maximum were relatively more consistent. Additionally, the dHRF was found to deviate from canonicity in several brain regions. Our results suggest that the choice of a standard, uniform HRF may be not optimal for all fMRI analyses and may lead to model misspecifications and statistical bias.

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & MetabolismVol. 45(9)
University of Minnesota (US), Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT), Centro Ricerche Enrico Fermi (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Resonance Research (United States) (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.